EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CB0394

Case C-394/19: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — PN, QO, RP, SQ, TR v Centre public d’action sociale d’Anderlecht (CPAS) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Citizenship of the European Union — Right of EU citizens and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of a Member State — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 3 — Beneficiaries — Incorrect transposition — Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law — Grant of social assistance as compensation for the damage suffered — Manifest inadmissibility)

OJ C 44, 8.2.2021, p. 9–9 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

8.2.2021   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/9


Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — PN, QO, RP, SQ, TR v Centre public d’action sociale d’Anderlecht (CPAS)

(Case C-394/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Citizenship of the European Union - Right of EU citizens and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of a Member State - Directive 2004/38/EC - Article 3 - Beneficiaries - Incorrect transposition - Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law - Grant of social assistance as compensation for the damage suffered - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2021/C 44/12)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: PN, QO, RP, SQ, TR

Defendant: Centre public d’action sociale d’Anderlecht (CPAS)

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles (Brussels Labour Court (French-speaking), Belgium) by decision of 14 May 2019 is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 246, 22.7.2019.


Top