This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52013PC0718
Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff
Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff
Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff
/* COM/2013/0718 final - 2013/0341 (NLE) */
Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff /* COM/2013/0718 final - 2013/0341 (NLE) */
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL The purpose of the attached proposal for a
Regulation is the suspension of the autonomous common customs tariff duties on
jet fuel, which is currently classified under CN code 2710 19 21. Currently, bilateral aviation agreements
with third countries typically include provisions concerning duty relief to jet
fuel. However, it is necessary to ensure, at European level, clarity and
uniformity in this regard, thus providing legal certainty for operators as well
as avoiding any distortion of competition resulting from differing approaches
and rules. The vast majority of jet fuel imports to
the European Union (EU) originates in countries that benefit from the Generalised
Scheme of Preferences (GSP) and are, thus, duty free. This has a significant
importance for the EU air industry. Following the revision of the GSP scheme,
regarding the preferences that will apply as of 1 January 2014, large exporting
producers of jet fuel such as the Gulf Cooperation Council countries (GCC) will
cease to be beneficiaries of this preferential access to the EU, whereas others
(India), at least for the period 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016 will not
benefit from the GSP for some categories of products, including fuel. The imposition of customs duties on jet
fuel from those suppliers would likely have an abrupt impact on the price of
jet fuel on the EU market in the absence of a diversification of the sourcing
of jet fuel for the EU market. Moreover, refineries in the EU would not be able
to increase production of aviation fuel to any significant degree at short
notice, since this implies producing other derivative products, such as
gasoline for which new exports opportunities would need to be explored. Both
the EU air and oil industry sector therefore need time to adjust to the
consequences of the graduation of these supplier countries from GSP status. Taking into account possible future changes
in the market situation, the suspension should be reviewed on the basis of
proportionate assessment within five years. In the light of the foregoing it is
proposed to amend Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 accordingly. The proposal to prolong the status-quo is
in line with the Union's policies. 2. RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS WITH
THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS The Economic Tariff Questions Group, in
which the competent authorities of all Member State are represented, was
consulted. There was no mention of potentially serious
risks with irreversible consequences. This proposal will follow an inter-service
consultation procedure and will be published after its adoption by the Council. 3. LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE
PROPOSAL The legal basis of this regulation proposal
is Article 31 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). By virtue of Article 31 of the TFEU,
autonomous tariff rate is fixed by the Council acting by qualified majority on
the basis of a Commission proposal. The proposal complies with the
proportionality principle given that, as foreseen in the Treaty, it promotes
trade between Member States and third countries and balances the commercial
interest of economic operators (service providers in the Union, users and
consumers) without changing the EU WTO schedule. The subsidiarity principle does not apply, as
the proposal falls under the exclusive competence of the Union. 4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION There is no loss in the revenues of the
Traditional Own Resources against the current situation. There is a potential
non-realisation of additional revenues in view of the changes of the GSP status
of certain third countries as of 01 January 2014. However, in view of bilateral
aviation agreements currently applied that provide for duty relief to aviation
fuel, the possible loss of additional revenue in Traditional Own Resources as
of 01/01/2014 is considered to be negligible. 2013/0341 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No
2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs
Tariff THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 31 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission, Whereas: (1) The European Union (EU)
market for jet fuel depends considerably on imports of jet fuel from third
countries. (2) Although bilateral
aviation agreements between Member States and third countries typically include
provisions concerning duty relief for jet fuel, it is necessary to lay down
common rules on duty relief for jet fuel in order to ensure clarity and
uniformity in this regard, provide legal certainty for operators and avoid any
distortion of competition resulting from differing practices and rules. (3) Currently, a significant
part of jet fuel imports to the Union originates in countries that benefit from
the scheme of generalised tariff preferences or have preferential access to the
Union market, and thus the imports are duty free. (4) With the application of
tariff preferences in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 978/2012[1] starting from 1 January 2014, a
number of countries which are important exporters of jet fuel will cease to be beneficiaries
of this preferential access to the Union market, and certain other exporting
countries will not benefit from this preferential access for certain product
categories, including fuel[2].
(5) The imposition of customs
duties on jet fuel from those suppliers would likely cause an increase in the
price of jet fuel on the Union market as it is not economically viable for refineries
in the Union to increase their production of aviation fuel to any significant
degree. (6) Taking into account
possible future changes in the market situation of jet fuel, this measure
should be reviewed on the basis of a proportionate assessment within five
years. (7) It is therefore appropriate
to suspend the autonomous rate of customs duty for jet fuel. The suspension
should cover all products falling within CN code 2710 19 21. (8) Annex I to Council
Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87[3]
should therefore be amended accordingly, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 In Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87,
the text for CN code 2710 19 21 in column 3 of the table in Part Two, Section
V, Chapter 27, is replaced by the following: ‘4,7 (*) _________________ (*)
Autonomous rate of duty: Free.’ Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on 1
January 2014. This Regulation shall be binding
in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, For
the Council The
President LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT NAME OF THE PROPOSAL: Proposal for a Council Regulation
amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the Tariff and Statistical
Nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff. BUDGET LINES: Chapter and Article: Chapter 12,
Article 120 Amount
budgeted for the year 2014: 18.086.400.000 € (DB 2014) FINANCIAL IMPACT: ¨ Proposal has no financial implications X Proposal has no financial impact
on expenditure but it may have a potential financial impact, yet of negligible
nature, for the following reasons: In
2012, the total value of imports of CN code 2710 19 21 amounted to 12,2 Billion
€[4]. The conventional rate of duty
for this CN code is 4,7%. The
vast majority of these imports (above 97%) were duty free as a result of the
implementation of Free Trade Agreements and the GSP. As
of 1/1/2014 a number of important exporting countries (accounting for 82% of
imports) will no longer benefit from the GSP. This could evenually represent a
potential revenue intake of approxiamtely 470 Mio € for Traditional Own
Resources. However,
there exists currently more than 1 500 Air transport agreements between EU or
Member States and third countries and Member States have issued national
provisions for the stores of aircraft. In
view of this score of Member States measures that provide for duty relief to
aviation fuel, the possible loss of the additional revenue in Traditional Own
Resources as of 01/01/2014 is considered to be negligible. [1] Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 applying a scheme of
generalised tariff preferences and repealing Council Regulation (EC)
No 732/2008 (OJ L 303, 31.10.2012, p.1). [2] Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) of
17 December 2012 suspending the tariff preferences for certain GSP beneficiary
countries in respect of certain GSP sections in accordance with Regulation (EU)
No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council applying a
scheme of generalised tariff preferences (OJ L 348, 18.12.2012, p.11). [3] Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987
on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ
L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1). [4] Source Eurostat – Statistical procedure: Normal