(13a)

In the event of a breach of a European supervision measure, the issuing authority may decide to issue a European arrest warrant for the purpose of transferring the person concerned to the issuing State. In such circumstances, which should be strictly limited to the application of this Framework Decision, Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA covers all offences in relation to which a European supervision measure may be issued.

(17a)

A uniform common set of procedural safeguards is a necessary prerequisite to ensuring a fair and effective application of measures concerning judicial cooperation in criminal matters; taking into due consideration the opinion of the European Parliament, the Council should without delay adopt a legal instrument on procedural safeguards in criminal proceedings, based on the principle of the presumption of innocence, which should include at least the authorisation issued by the judicial authority for any restriction or deprivation of liberty, the right to a ‘Letter of Rights’, to legal advice, to evidence, to be informed of the nature and reasons of the charges and of the grounds for suspicion, the right to access to all relevant documents in a language which the person concerned understands and to an interpreter;

a)

‘decision on supervision measures’ shall mean an enforceable decision taken in the course of criminal proceedings by a competent authority of the issuing State in accordance with its national law and procedures and imposing on a natural person, as an alternative to provisional detention, one or more supervision measures;

a)

‘decision on supervision measures’ shall mean an enforceable decision taken in the course of criminal proceedings by a competent judicial authority of the issuing State in accordance with its national law and procedures and imposing on a natural person, as an alternative to provisional detention, one or more supervision measures;

(da)

‘competent authority in the issuing State’ shall mean a court, judge, investigating magistrate or public prosecutor, with competence under national law to issue a decision on supervision measures;

(db)

‘competent authority in the executing State’ shall mean a court, judge, investigating magistrate or public prosecutor, with competence under national law to execute and monitor decision on supervision measures.

(fa)

an obligation to deposit a certain sum of money or to give another type of security, which may either be provided in a specific number of instalments or in one lump sum.

c)

an obligation to deposit a certain sum of money or to give another type of guarantee, which may either be provided through a specific number of instalments or entirely at once;

—

participation in a criminal organisation,

—

terrorism,

—

trafficking in human beings,

—

sexual exploitation of children and child pornography,

—

illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances,

—

illicit trafficking in weapons, munitions and explosives,

—

corruption,

—

fraud, including that affecting the financial interests of the European Communities within the meaning of the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests 1,

—

laundering of the proceeds of crime,

—

counterfeiting currency, including of the euro,

—

computer-related crime,

—

environmental crime, including illicit trafficking in endangered animal species and in endangered plant species and varieties,

—

facilitation of unauthorised entry and residence,

—

murder, grievous bodily injury,

—

illicit trade in human organs and tissue,

—

kidnapping, illegal restraint and hostage-taking,

—

racism and xenophobia,

—

organised or armed robbery,

—

illicit trafficking in cultural goods, including antiques and works of art,

—

swindling,

—

racketeering and extortion,

—

counterfeiting and piracy of products,

—

forgery of administrative documents and trafficking therein,

—

forgery of means of payment,

—

illicit trafficking in hormonal substances and other growth promoters,

—

illicit trafficking in nuclear or radioactive materials,

—

trafficking in stolen vehicles,

—

rape,

—

arson,

—

crimes within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court,

—

unlawful seizure of aircraft/ships,

—

sabotage.

(d)

the decision on supervision measures relates, in the cases referred to in Article 14(3) and, where the executing State has made a declaration under Article 14(4), in the cases referred to in Article 14(1), to an act which would not constitute an offence under the law of the executing State; in tax, customs and currency matters, however, execution of the decision may not be refused on the grounds that the law of the executing State does not prescribe any taxes of the same kind or does not contain any tax, customs or currency provisions of the same kind as the law of the issuing State;

2.

If the alleged offence(s) referred to in point 1 constitute(s) one or more of the following alleged offences, as defined in the law of the issuing State which are punishable in the issuing State by a custodial sentence or measure involving deprivation of liberty of a maximum of at least three years, please confirm by ticking the relevant box(es):

3.

To the extent that the alleged offence(s) identified under point 1 is (are) not covered by point 2 or if the decision, as well as the certificate are forwarded to a Member State, which has declared that it will verify the double criminality (Article 14(4) of the Framework Decision), please give a full description of the alleged offence(s) concerned: