‘—   in Bulgaria: Article 4, paragraph 1, point 2, of the Private International Law Code,’,

‘—   in Estonia: Article 86 of the Code of Civil Procedure (tsiviilkohtumenetluse seadustik),’,

‘—   in Poland: Article 1103, paragraph 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure (Kodeks postępowania cywilnego),’,

‘—   in Portugal: Article 65(1)(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Código de Processo Civil) in so far as it may encompass exorbitant grounds of jurisdiction, such as the courts for the place in which the branch, agency or other establishment is situated (if situated in Portugal) when the central administration (if situated in a foreign State) is the party sued and Article 10 of the Code of Labour Procedure (Código de Processo do Trabalho) in so far as it may encompass exorbitant grounds of jurisdiction, such as the courts for the place where the plaintiff is domiciled in proceedings relating to individual contracts of employment brought by the employee against the employer,’,

‘—   in Switzerland: Article 4 of the Federal Act on Private International Law (Gerichtsstand des Arrestortes/for du lieu du séquestre/foro del luogo del sequestro),’,

‘—   in Finland: paragraphs 1 and 2 of Section 18(1) of Chapter 10 of the Code of Judicial Procedure (oikeudenkäymiskaari/rättegångsbalken),’;

‘—   in Bulgaria: the “окръжният съд”,’,

‘—   in Switzerland: the “kantonales Vollstreckungsgericht”/“tribunal cantonal de l’exécution”/“giudice cantonale dell’esecuzione”,’,

‘—   in the United Kingdom: (…)

(…)’;

‘—   in Spain: the “Juzgado de Primera Instancia” which issued the contested decision with the appeal to be solved by the “Audiencia Provincial”,’,

‘—   in Switzerland: the higher cantonal court,’;