EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Brussels, 11.7.2023
COM(2023) 407 final
2023/0268(NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL DECISION
on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organisation and repealing Decision (EU) 2019/864
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.Subject matter of the proposal
This proposal concerns a Decision establishing the position to be taken on the behalf of the European Union at meetings of the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organisation (NASCO) for the period 2024-2028 in connection with the envisaged adoption of conservation and management measures.
2.Context of the proposal
2.1.Convention for the Conservation of Salmon in the North Atlantic Ocean
The Convention for the Conservation of Salmon in the North Atlantic Ocean (NASCO Convention) aims, by establishing the NASCO, to conserve, restore, enhance and rationally manage wild Atlantic salmon. The Convention entered into force on 1 October 1983.
The EU is a party to the NASCO Convention, having approved it under Council Decision 82/886/EEC.
2.2.Council of the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organisation
The NASCO Council, supported by the three NASCO Commissions (the North American Commission, the North-East Atlantic Commission and the West Greenland Commission), is the body established by the NASCO Convention to conserve, restore, enhance and rationally manage Atlantic salmon through international cooperation. It adopts conservation and management measures to manage the fishery resources for which it is responsible.
As a member of the NASCO Council and two of its Commissions (the North-East Atlantic Commission and the West Greenland Commission), the EU is entitled to participate in, and vote on, its decisions. The NASCO Council takes its decisions by unanimity.
2.3.NASCO Council decisions
The NASCO Council has the authority to adopt conservation and enforcement measures for the fisheries under its purview and these are binding on the contracting parties.
In accordance with Article 13(2) of the NASCO Convention, the measures enter into force 60 days after the date on which the contracting parties are notified of them by the NASCO, unless a contracting party lodges an objection in 60 days from the notification of the measure.
3.Position to be taken on the EU’s behalf
The position to be adopted on behalf of the Union at the annual meetings of regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs) is currently established according to a two‑tier approach. A Council Decision sets out the guiding principles of the EU’s position on a multiannual basis and it is subsequently adjusted for each annual meeting by Commission services non-papers to be endorsed by the Council.
For the NASCO, this approach is implemented by Council Decision (EU) 2019/864 of 14 May 2019, which sets out the EU’s position in the NASCO for the period 2019-2023. The Decision contains general principles, but also takes into account as far as possible the specific features of the NASCO. In addition, it sets out the standard process for establishing the EU’s position year by year, as requested by Member States.
Council Decision (EU) 2019/864 incorporated the principles of the new common fisheries policy, as laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, also taking into account the objectives set out in the Commission Communication on the external dimension of the common fisheries policy. Moreover, it adjusted the EU’s position to the Treaty of Lisbon.
Council Decision (EU) 2019/864 provides for an assessment, and where appropriate, a revision of the EU’s position before the 2024 annual meeting. Therefore, this proposal sets out the EU’s position in the NASCO for the period 2024-2028, thereby replacing Council Decision (EU) 2019/864.
The current revision takes into consideration, in relation to fishing, the European Green Deal, notably Biodiversity, Climate Adaptation and Farm to Fork Strategies. It also takes into account the Plastics Strategy and the Zero pollution Action Plan. Furthermore, it also takes into consideration, the International Ocean Governance Joint Communication.
4.Legal basis
4.1.Procedural legal basis
4.1.1.Principles
Article 218(9) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides for decisions establishing ‘the positions to be adopted on the EU’s behalf in a body set up by an agreement, when that body is called upon to adopt acts having legal effects, with the exception of acts supplementing or amending the institutional framework of the agreement’.
‘Acts having legal effects’ include acts that have legal effects by virtue of the rules of international law governing the body in question, and instruments that do not have a binding effect under international law, but are ‘capable of decisively influencing the content of the legislation adopted by the EU legislature’.
4.1.2.Application to the present case
The NASCO Council, supported by its Commissions, is the body set up by an agreement, namely the NASCO Convention.
The acts that the NASCO Council is called upon to adopt constitute acts having legal effects. The envisaged acts may be binding under international law in accordance with Article 13 of the NASCO Convention and are capable of decisively influencing the content of EU legislation, including:
·Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing;
·Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy; and
·Regulation (EU) 2017/2403 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 on the sustainable management of external fishing fleets.
The envisaged acts do not supplement or amend the institutional framework of the NASCO Convention.
Therefore, the procedural legal basis for the proposed Decision is Article 218(9) TFEU.
4.2.Substantive legal basis
4.2.1.Principles
The substantive legal basis for a Decision under Article 218(9) TFEU depends primarily on the objective and content of the envisaged act in respect of which a position is taken on the EU’s behalf. If that act pursues two aims or has two components, and if one of those aims or components is identifiable as the main one, whereas the other is merely incidental, the Decision under Article 218(9) TFEU must be founded on a single substantive legal basis, namely that required by the main or predominant aim or component.
4.2.2.Application to the present case
The main objective and content of the envisaged act relate to fisheries. The legal basis setting out the principles to be reflected in this position is Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Therefore, the substantive legal basis of the proposed Decision is Article 43(2) TFEU. The Decision will replace Council Decision (EU) 2019/864, which covers the period 2019-2023.
4.3.Conclusion
The legal basis of the proposed Decision should be Article 43(2) TFEU, in conjunction with Article 218(9) TFEU.
2023/0268 (NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL DECISION
on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organisation and repealing Decision (EU) 2019/864
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(2), in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1)By Council Decision (EC) No 886/82, the European Community concluded the Convention for the Conservation of Salmon in the North Atlantic Ocean (‘NASCO Convention’), which established the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organisation (‘NASCO’).
(2)The NASCO Council adopts conservation and management measures to manage of the fishery resources under their purview. Such measures may become binding upon the Union.
(3)Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council provides that the Union is to ensure that fishing and aquaculture activities are environmentally sustainable in the long-term and are managed in a way that is consistent with the objectives of achieving economic, social and employment benefits, and of contributing to the availability of food supplies. It also provides that the Union is to apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and is to aim to ensure that exploitation of living marine biological resources restores and maintains the population of harvested species above levels, which can produce the maximum sustainable yield. It further provides that the Union is to take management and conservation measures based on best available scientific advice, to support the development of scientific knowledge and advice, to gradually eliminate discards and to promote fishing methods that contribute to more selective fishing and the avoidance and reduction, as far as possible, of unwanted catches, to fishing with low impact on marine ecosystem and fishery resources. Besides, Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 specifically provides that those objectives and principles are to be applied by the Union in the conduct of its external fisheries relations.
(4)In line with the Biodiversity, Climate Adaptation and Farm to Fork Strategies, it is essential to protect nature and reverse the degradation of ecosystems. The risks stemming from climate change and loss of biodiversity must not jeopardise the availability of the goods and services that healthy marine ecosystems provide to fishers, coastal communities and humanity at large.
(5)The Plastics Strategy refers to specific measures to reduce plastics and marine pollution as well as the loss or abandonment at sea of fishing gear. Furthermore, the Zero pollution Action Plan aims at reducing by 50% plastic litter at sea and by 30% micro-plastics released into the environment.
(6)Under the International Ocean Governance Joint Communication, marine biodiversity protection and conservation are key priorities under the EU’s external action The EU is the most prominent actor in Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) and fisheries bodies worldwide. There, the EU promotes the sustainability of fish stocks, promotes transparent decision-making based on sound scientific advice, enhances scientific research, and strengthens compliance.
(7)Currently, the position to be taken on the Union’s behalf in the meetings of the NASCO is established by Council Decision (EU) 2019/864. It is appropriate to repeal that Decision and establish a new Decision for the period 2024-2028.
(8)It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union’s behalf in the meetings of the NASCO Council, as the NASCO conservation and enforcement measures may be binding on the Union and capable of decisively influencing the content of Union law, namely, Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008; Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009; and Regulation (EU) 2017/2403 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
(9)In view of the evolving nature of fishery resources in the NASCO Convention Area and the consequent need for the Union’s position to take account of new developments, including new scientific and other relevant information presented before or during the meetings of the NASCO, procedures should be established, for the year-to-year specification of the Union’s position for the period 2024-2028. Those positions should be in line with the principle of sincere cooperation among the Union institutions enshrined in Article 13(2) of the Treaty on the European Union.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The position to be taken on the Union in the meetings of the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organisation (NASCO) Council is set out in Annex I of this Decision.
Article 2
The year-to-year specification of the Union’s position to be taken in the meetings of the NASCO Council shall be conducted in accordance with Annex II.
Article 3
The Union’s position set out in Annex I shall be assessed and, where appropriate, revised by the Council upon a proposal from the Commission, at the latest for the annual meeting of the NASCO Council in 2029.
Article 4
Decision (EU) 2019/864 is repealed.
Article 5
This Decision is addressed to the Commission.
Done at Brussels,
For the Council
The President