This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52014PC0701
Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2013/014 FR/Air France from France)
Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2013/014 FR/Air France from France)
Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2013/014 FR/Air France from France)
/* COM/2014/0701 final */
Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2013/014 FR/Air France from France) /* COM/2014/0701 final */
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM Article 12 of Council Regulation (EU,
Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for
the years 2014-2020[1]
allows for the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF)
within the annual ceiling of EUR 150 million (2011 prices) over
and above the relevant headings of the financial framework. The rules applicable to the contributions
from the EGF for applications submitted until 31 December 2013 are laid down in
Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
20 December 2006 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund[2],. On 20 December 2013, France submitted application EGF/2013/014 FR/Air France for a financial contribution from the EGF,
following redundancies in Air France in France. After a thorough examination of this
application, the Commission has concluded in accordance with Article 10 of
Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 that the conditions for a financial contribution
under this Regulation are met. SUMMARY OF THE APPLICATION AND ANALYSIS Key data: || EGF Reference no. || EGF/2013/014 Member State || France Article 2 || (a) Primary enterprise || Air France Suppliers and downstream producers || 0 Reference period || 1.7.2013 – 31.10.2013 Starting date for the personalised services || 6.11.2012 Application date || 20.12.2013 Redundancies during the reference period || 1 019 Redundancies before and after the reference period || 4 194 Total eligible redundancies || 5 213 Redundant workers expected to participate in the measures || 3 886 Expenditure for personalised services (EUR) || 51 845 626 Expenditure for implementing EGF[3] (EUR) || 30 000 Expenditure for implementing EGF (%) || 0,06 Total budget (EUR) || 51 875 626 EGF contribution (50 %) (EUR) || 25 937 813 1. The application was
presented to the Commission on 20 December 2013 and supplemented by additional
information up to 24 July 2014. 2. The application meets the
conditions for deploying the EGF as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC)
No 1927/2006, and was submitted within the deadline of 10 weeks referred to in
Article 5 of that Regulation. Link between the redundancies and
major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation 3. In order to establish the
link between the redundancies and major structural changes in world trade
patterns due to globalisation, France argues that although globally, the
international air transport market is still dominated by European airlines, this
sector has undergone serious economic disruption, in particular a decline of the
EU’s market share. Over the period 2008-2012, the global traffic increased by
4,6 % per year, as part of a trend of long-term growth observed since
1970. However the air traffic between Europe and the rest of the world is
growing at a slower pace (2,4 %) which has led to a decrease of the
EU-27’s market share in air transport measured in revenue passenger-kilometres
(RPK). 4. Despite the growth of
world traffic over the period 2008-2012, the growth of world air traffic
between Europe and the rest of the world was limited mainly due to weak growth
in flows between Europe and the Middle East. Whilst the decline in the air
traffic between the EU and four of the regions considered (North America, South
America, Africa and Asia) ranged 0,3 % to 2,8 %[4], the air traffic
between the EU and the Middle East declined by 11,4 %. 5. Available data for 2013[5] indicate that the trend
shown for the period 2008-2012 continues. Europe grew by 3,8 % in 2013
compared to 2012, below the world average (5,2 %), and accounts for 38 %
of the world traffic (measured in RPK), one percentage point less than in 2012.
The Middle East region remains the fastest growing in the world, expanding at 10,9 %
in 2013 and accounting for 9 % of the world traffic. 6. As shown in the chart
below, the evolution of market shares origin-destination between Europe on the
one hand, and sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and Asia, on the other hand,
shows a decline of EU airlines by nearly 10 percentage points in favour of the
Gulf carriers and Turkish Airlines between 2008 and 2013. 7. The effects of these
changes in trade patterns have been worsened by other factors such as a
decrease in demand as a consequence of the economic crisis and the increase of oil
prices (fuel represents sometimes almost one third of seat/kilometer costs). 8. The period 2008-2012 was
difficult for the three largest airlines in Europe Lufthansa, Air France-KLM
and IAG[6],
all of them show losses at least in two years out of the five years considered. Net
results of Air France-KLM, Lufthansa and IAG (2008-2012)[7]
(million euros)
9. The Air France-KLM group situation is particularly difficult because of its financial situation.
The group's debt ratio[8]
and net debt is higher than IAG's or Lufthansa's. Comparison of net debt and debt ratios in 2011 Source: Air France 10. Faced with a high debt and
an insufficient stock market capitalization (less than the value of its fleet)
Air France could not efficiently react to the loss of market share in
international air transport, which ended in a plan of several thousands of
voluntary departures agreed with the workers and employees representatives. Demonstration
of the number of redundancies and compliance with the criteria of Article 2(a) 11. France submitted this
application under the intervention criteria of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC)
No 1927/2006, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a four-month period
in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant in its
suppliers and downstream producers. 12. The application cites 1 019
redundancies in Air France during the four-month reference period from 1 July
2013 to 31 October 2013 and a further 4 194 redundancies outside the
reference period, but related to the same collective redundancies procedure.
All of these redundancies were calculated in accordance with the third indent
of the second paragraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. Explanation of the unforeseen nature
of those redundancies 13. The French authorities
argue that the growth of long-haul fleet of three major companies in the region
of the Persian Gulf was unexpected and spectacular. The number of long-haul
aircraft has increased from 100 in 2005, and nearly 200 in 2008 to over 300 in
2012, including a growing number of very large aircraft A380. A large majority
of the airline industry was doubtful about the reality of the intent and
economic model to make these investments profitable when these orders and
purchase intentions were announced by Gulf airlines. 14. The capacity of these companies
continues growing very rapidly with huge orders, such as those recorded in the Dubai air show in November 2013. Emirates created the surprise by announcing the purchase
of 150 units of Boeing 777x (capacity 342 to 440 seats) as well as 50
Super Jumbo A380 (capacity 500 seats per aircraft). Emirates alone covers
Airbus' sales targets for this aircraft for 2014 (25 units). Etihad Airways
announced an order for 56 long-haul Boeing and 87 Airbus aircraft, including 50
Airbus A350. Meanwhile, Qatar Airways has announced an order for five Airbus
A330-freighter and confirmed the purchase of 50 Boeing 777x aircraft which
were first ordered in November at the Dubai air show, and added purchase rights
for 50 more units of this long-haul aircraft[9]. 15. According to the press[10] the expansion plans at
Emirates, Qatar and Etihad highlight how the centre of gravity for global-air
travel has shifted to the Middle East from Europe and North America. 16. Moreover, this phenomenon
is part of a legal framework marked by a strong trend towards liberalization of
air services. Out of 28 EU Member states, 24 have signed agreements with the
Gulf countries offering their carriers broad access to the European market.
These rapidly changing 'rules of the game' deprive European carriers of the
predictability which was indispensable for planning their investments in fleet,
which value is considerable. 17. The price of oil has
remained at levels historically high. In 2011 fuel costs accounted for
24 % of air enterprises' revenue against 17 % in 2007. 18. The combination of these
circumstances and the situation in the air transport sector in the years following
the economic and financial crisis made difficult to predict the future
development of air transport and take the necessary adjustment measures less
suddenly. Identification of the dismissing
enterprises and workers targeted for assistance 19. The application relates to 5 213
redundancies. 20. The break-down of the 3 886
targeted workers is as follows: Category || Number || Percent Men || 2 322 || 59,75 Women || 1 564 || 40,25 EU citizens || 3 879 || 99,82 Non EU citizens || 7 || 0,18 15-24 years old || 1 || 0,03 25-54 years old || 1 206 || 31,03 55-64 years old || 2 679 || 68,94 > 64 years old || 0 || 0,00 21. There are 212 workers with
longstanding health problems or disability. 22. In terms of occupational
categories, the break-down is as follows: Category || Number || Percent Senior executives ("Cadres supérieurs") || 69 || 1,78 Middle-ranking executives ("Cadres") || 607 || 15,62 Technicians and supervisors ("Techniciens et agents de maîtrise") || 2 803 || 72,13 Employees and workers ("Employés, ouvriers") || 407 || 10,47 23. In accordance with Article
7 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, France has confirmed that a policy of
equality between women and men as well as non-discrimination has been applied,
and will continue to apply, during the various stages of the implementation of
and, in particular, in access to the EGF. Description of the territory
concerned and its authorities and stakeholders 24. The redundancies covered in
this application occurred mainly in the region of the Ile-de-France (77 %);
the remaining 23 % are spread across the country including Corse and DOM,
but predominantly (70 %) in the southern regions of Midi-Pyrénées and
Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur (PACA). 25. The competent authority is
the Ministry of Labour, Employment, Vocational Training and Social Dialogue, the
regional Direcctes[11]
and the Délégation générale à l’emploi et à la formation professionnelle
(DGEFP). Air France itself will be a major stakeholder, and will be co-ordinating
the scheme. 26. The French authorities
confirmed that the requirements laid down in national and EU legislation
concerning collective redundancies have been complied with. Expected impact of the redundancies
as regards local, regional or national employment 27. The largest number of
redundancies occurred in the Ile-de-France (mainly in Roissy). As this concerns
the region of Paris, unemployment levels tends to be lower than that of
metropolitan France while in PACA unemployment is 1,5 percentage points higher
and the unemployment level in Midi-Pyrénées is aligned to the metropolitan
France's level. Unemployment
levels
in the regions mainly concerned by the redundancies
Source: INSEE[12] 28. The French authorities
argue that the redundancies in Air France will aggravate the unemployment
situation, which has already deteriorated as a result of the economic and
financial crisis. In the period 2008-2013 unemployment rose by 38,7 % in
Ile-de-France, 37,8 % in PACA, 47,0 % in Midi-Pyrénées and by
44,1 % in metropolitan France. Furthermore, Ile-de-France faces another
mass redundancy as the Peugeot Citroën Automobile (PSA) production plant in
Aulnay is being closed entirely in 2014. 29. In the territory concerned
by the redundancies about 40 % of the unemployed persons have been
unemployed for more than one year and there are seven job-seekers for every
job. 30. As Air France employs more than one thousand workers, it is obliged to contribute to the
revitalisation of these regions under Article L1233-84 of the Code du
Travail. This means that Air France will contribute to the creation of new
activities and jobs so as to alleviate the impact of the dismissals in these
regions. Co-ordinated package of personalised
services to be funded and a breakdown of its estimated costs, including its
complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds 31. The "Projet
Transform 2015", which is the object of this EGF application from France, aims to support the 5 213 workers who volunteered to leave the company and
specifically the 3 886 targeted workers. 32. The measure within the
"Projet Transform 2015" for which the French authorities seek
EGF co-funding is the redeployment leave ("congé de reclassement")[13]. This measure is intended
for workers who, at the time of their voluntary departure, do not yet have any
precise plans for redeployment and wish to benefit, over a period which can
extend to nine months and under certain circumstances up to 15 months[14], from retraining
measures, advice, guidance or assistance to set up or take over a business. –
Advisory services and vocational guidance for
workers. The workers will be accompanied and
oriented towards their projects for redeployment as workers or self-employed
persons. The participants will avail of job-to-job counselling and guidance,
job search support, coaching, information on available training, promotion of
entrepreneurship and advice on business start-up (this can include search for
funding, help with a business plan, and other accompanying services towards
entrepreneurship), etc. –
Training. The
workers will be proposed various types of trainings which are tailored to their
needs, as identified by the counsellors providing the advisory services.
Particular attention will be paid to the 'parcours encadrés' which are
vocational trainings of long duration on jobs in demand. Some examples of
possible vocational trainings are: training on vines and wine (winemaker), food
and beverage services CAP[15]
fresh pastry goods and cakes, training towards DAEFLE (degree of proficiency in
teaching French as a foreign language), metal works occupations, training
towards CTRIV[16]
(passengers driver), etc. – Contribution for business creation. This
measure comprises a grant up to EUR 24 000 which can be complemented
with up to EUR 5 000 hiring benefits. The contribution for business
creation will be paid in various instalments once certain milestones have been
reached. A first instalment of EUR 3 000 will be paid upon
presentation of proof of setting up or taking over a business, such as the receipt
of registration. A second and third instalment of EUR 6 000 each upon
presentation of the first and second VAT return on sales showing a minimum
turnover of at least EUR 500 and EUR 1 000 respectively. The
self-employed persons and sole proprietors who are exempted from property
assessment[17]
will receive the second and a third instalment of EUR 6 000 upon
presentation of the first and second statement of activity to the RSI[18], indicating a turnover
of at least EUR 200 and EUR 500 respectively with proof of payment of
dues. An additional instalment of EUR 9 000 is foreseen for
enterprises, self-employed persons and sole proprietors not exempted from
property assessment upon presentation of the first year tax return certified
approved.
For hiring in a full-time permanent position a former Air France worker
targeted for EGF assistance, the contribution for business creation will
additionally be topped-up with EUR 3 000 (EUR 5 000 if the
recruited worker is over 55). –
Regular information and communication activities aimed at the participants workers. –
Redeployment allowance (allocation de congé de reclassement).
This monthly allowance, paid until the end of the congé de
reclassement, amounts to 70 % of the worker's last gross salary. This
amount is calculated based on the assumption of the workers' full-time
participation in active labour market measures; if participation is to a lesser
extent, the EGF will pay workers an allowance which is proportionate to their
actual participation. –
Mobility allowance. The targeted worker who accepts a job, involving a change of
residence of more than 100 km from the current place of residence, will receive
a lump sum of EUR 2 880 to cover the necessary expenditure.. 33. The expenditure for
implementing the EGF, which is included in the application in accordance with
Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, covers organisation,
monitoring and traceability of the data. The French authorities explained that
the low level of expenditure for implementing the EGF and the zero rating of
control measures and information and publicity were due to the fact that they
did not price activities which they were in any case obliged to carry out as
part of the national management. 34. The personalised services
presented by the French authorities are active labour market measures within
the eligible actions defined by Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The French
authorities estimate the total costs at EUR 51 875 626, of which
the expenditure for personalised services at EUR 51 845 626 and
the expenditure for implementing the EGF at EUR 30 000 (0,06 %
of the total amount). The total contribution requested from the EGF is
EUR 25 937 813 (50 % of the total costs). Actions || Estimated number of workers targeted || Estimated cost per worker targeted (EUR) (*) || Total costs (EGF and national cofinancing) (EUR) (**) Personalised services (first paragraph of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006) Advisory services and vocational guidance for workers (Orientation professionelle) || 3 886 || 1 385 || 5 382 694 Training (Formation) || 1 268 || 2 567 || 3 255 292 Contribution for business creation (Primes à la crèation d'entreprise) || 955 || 22 000 || 21 010 000 Regular information and communication activities (Actions de communication destinés aux travailleurs concernés) || 3 886 || 70 || 272 020 Redeployment allowance (allocation de congé de reclassement) || 3 379 || 6 387 || 21 580 020 Mobility allowance (Mobilité géographique) || 120 || 2 880 || 345 600 Sub total personalised services || || 51 845 626 Expenditure for implementing EGF (third paragraph of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006) Preparatory activities || || 0 Organisation, monitoring and traceability of the data || || 30 000 Information and publicity || || 0 Control activities || || 0 Sub total expenditure for implementing EGF || || 30 000 Total estimated costs || || 51 875 626 EGF contribution (50 % of total costs) || || 25 937 813 (*) To avoid decimals, the estimated
costs per worker have been rounded. However the rounding has no impact on the
total cost of each measure which remains as in the application submitted by France. (**) Totals
do not tally due to roundings. 35. The French authorities did
not indicate how the measures described above are complementary with actions
funded by the Structural Funds. However, they explained that there is no public
intervention foreseen in support of former Air France workers. Since Air France
is a company in bonis (i.e. not in liquidation) employing 1000 employees
or more, it is the employer's responsibility to pay the full costs of
accompanying measures to ensure the redeployment of employees laid off (see
footnote on redeployment leave, in paragraph 31). 36. The French authorities have
additionally stated that they have concluded a written agreement with the
dismissing enterprise to the effect that in implementing the measures described
above it will not also receive financial contributions from other Union
financial instruments for the same measures. Date(s) on which the personalised
services to the affected workers were started or are planned to start 37. France started the
personalised services to the affected workers included in the co-ordinated
package proposed for co-financing to the EGF on 6 November 2012. This date
therefore represents the beginning of the period of eligibility for any
assistance that might be awarded from the EGF. Procedures for consulting the social
partners 38. The French authorities have
indicated that the co-ordinated package of personalised services has been drawn
up in consultation with the representatives of the targeted beneficiaries and the
social partners. Numerous meetings between the Air France management and trade
union representatives took place between Q1 2012 and July 2013 concerning
the agreements on the Transform 2015 plan. 39. The French authorities
confirmed that the requirements laid down in national and EU legislation
concerning collective redundancies have been complied with. Information on actions that are
mandatory by virtue of national law or pursuant to collective agreements 40. As regards the criteria
contained in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, the French authorities
in their application: · confirmed that the financial contribution from the EGF does not
replace measures which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of
national law or collective agreements; · demonstrated that the actions provide support for individual workers
and are not to be used for restructuring companies or sectors; · confirmed that the eligible actions referred to above do not receive
assistance from other EU financial instruments. Management and control systems 41. The application contains a
description of the management and control system which specifies the
responsibilities of the bodies involved. France has notified the Commission
that the financial contribution will be managed by the Délégation générale à
l’emploi et à la formation professionnelle (DGEFP, General Delegation for
Employment and Vocational Training) of the Ministry of Labour, Employment and
Health. The payments will be managed within the same ministry by the
Département Financiement, Dialogue et Contrôle de Gestion - Mission du
financement, du budget et du dialogue de gestion (DGEFP-MFBDG, Mission funding, budget and management). Certification will be provided by the Pôle de
Certification (Certification Centre) of the Directorate-General for Finances in
Nantes. Financing 42. On the basis of the
application from France, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the
coordinated package of personalised services (including expenditure to
implement EGF) is EUR 25 937 813, representing 50 % of the
total cost. The Commission's proposed allocation under the Fund is based on the
information made available by France. 43. Considering the maximum
possible amount of a financial contribution from the EGF under Article 12 of
Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013, as well as the scope for
reallocating appropriations, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for
the total amount referred to above. 44. The proposed decision to
mobilise the EGF will be taken jointly by the European Parliament and the
Council, as laid down in point 13 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2
December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission
on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound
financial management[19]. 45. The Commission presents
separately a transfer request in order to enter in the 2014 budget specific
commitment appropriations, as required in Point 13 of the Interinstitutional
Agreement of 2 December 2013. Source of payment appropriations 46. Appropriations allocated to
the EGF budget line in the 2014 budget will be used to cover the amounto of
EUR 25 937 813. Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
AND OF THE COUNCIL on the mobilisation of the European
Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 13 of the
Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European
Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound
financial management (application EGF/2013/014 FR/Air France from France) THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No
1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006
establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund[20], and in particular
Article 12(3) thereof, Having regard to Regulation (EU) N°
1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on
the European Globalisation Fund (2014-2020) and repealing Regulation (EC) N°
1927/2006[21],
Having regard to the Interinstitutional
Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of
2 December 2013 on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary
matters and on sound financial management[22],
and in particular point 13 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission[23], Whereas: (1) The European Globalisation
Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide additional support for workers
made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns
due to globalisation and to assist them with their reintegration into the
labour market. (2) The EGF shall not exceed a
maximum annual amount of EUR 150 million (2011 prices), as laid down in
Article 12 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013
laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020[24]. (3) France submitted an
application to mobilise the EGF, in respect of redundancies in the enterprise Air
France, on 20 December 2013 and supplemented it by additional information up
to 24 July 2014. This application complies with the requirements for
determining the financial contributions as laid down in Article 10 of
Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The Commission, therefore, proposes
to mobilise an amount of EUR 25 937 813. (4) The EGF should, therefore,
be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution for the application
submitted by France, HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 For the general budget of the European
Union for the financial year 2014, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund
(EGF) shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 25 937 813 in
commitment and payment appropriations. Article 2 This Decision shall be published in the Official
Journal of the European Union. Done at Brussels, For the European Parliament For
the Council The President The
President [1] OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 884. [2] OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 1. See also Article 23 of
Regulation (EU) 1309/2013, OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 855. [3] In accordance with the third paragraph of Article 3
of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. [4] EU-27 – North America declined by 0,5 %, EU-27 –
South America by 1,8 %, EU-27 – Africa by 2,8 %, EU-27 – Asia by 1,2 % [5] http://www.icao.int/Newsroom/News%20Doc%202013/COM.43.13.ECON-RESULTS.Final-2.en.pdf [6] IAG includes British Airways and Iberia. [7] Source: Les compagnies aériennes européennes sont-elles mortelles? Perspectives
à vingt ans [8] Debt ratio is defined as the ratio of total debt to
total assets. [9] http://online.wsj.com/articles/qatar-airways-confirms-purchase-of-50-boeing-777x-aircraft-1405504408 [10] http://dohanews.co/qatar-airways-to-buy-50-long-haul-b777x-planes-from-boeing/ [11] Direccte
(Directions régionales des entreprises, de la concurrence, de la consommation,
du travail et de l'emploi) http://www.direccte.gouv.fr/.
Established in 2010, Direccte brings together various
administrative services related to trade,
tourism, commerce and industry, business intelligence,
industry, labour and employment, competition
and consumers [12] Institut
national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE). http://www.insee.fr [13] As regards the redeployment
leave (‘congé de reclassement’), Article L1233-71 of the Labour Code provides that a company which
employs more than one thousand people is required to propose the measures set
out therein for a minimum duration of four months. According to the
above-mentioned legislation, the period as from the fifth month is therefore
optional and may be subject to a contribution from the EGF in accordance with
Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC)
No 1927/2006. Air France has decided to propose this measure for a maximum
period of twelve months. The application does not provide for any contributions
for the first four months of the redeployment leave, which correspond to the
minimum duration stipulated by law. [14] Exceptionally, the workers following a ‘parcours
encadré’ (i.e. vocational training of long duration on jobs in demand) can
see their redeployment leave ‘congé
de reclassement’ extended up to 15 months to cover the completion of the parcours
encadré and additional three months of accompanied job-search. [15] CPA
stands for Certificate for professional aptitude. [16] Conducteur(trice)
du transport routier interurbain de voyageurs (CTRIV) [17] "micro-social", ultra simplified social system,
etc [18] Régime
Social des Indépendants (social scheme for self-employed persons). [19] OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p. 1. [20] OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 1. [21] OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 855. [22] OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p. 1. [23] OJ C […], […], p. […]. [24] OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 884.