This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52014DC0074
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Report on the implementation and functioning of Regulation (EU) No 1342/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 as regards the inclusion of the Kaliningrad oblast and certain Polish administrative districts in the eligible border area and on the bilateral agreement concluded thereof between Poland and the Russian Federation
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Report on the implementation and functioning of Regulation (EU) No 1342/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 as regards the inclusion of the Kaliningrad oblast and certain Polish administrative districts in the eligible border area and on the bilateral agreement concluded thereof between Poland and the Russian Federation
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Report on the implementation and functioning of Regulation (EU) No 1342/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 as regards the inclusion of the Kaliningrad oblast and certain Polish administrative districts in the eligible border area and on the bilateral agreement concluded thereof between Poland and the Russian Federation
/* COM/2014/074 final */
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Report on the implementation and functioning of Regulation (EU) No 1342/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 as regards the inclusion of the Kaliningrad oblast and certain Polish administrative districts in the eligible border area and on the bilateral agreement concluded thereof between Poland and the Russian Federation /* COM/2014/074 final */
1. Introduction The
European Parliament and the Council adopted in 2006 a Regulation laying down
rules on local border traffic at the external land borders of the Member States
("Local Border Traffic Regulation")[1]
which allows derogating, for persons living in a border area, from the general
rules on border checks set out in the Schengen Borders Code. The Regulation
authorises Member States to conclude bilateral agreements with neighbouring
non-EU countries, provided these agreements fully comply with the parameters
set by the Regulation. In
February 2011, the Commission concluded in its second report on the
implementation and functioning of the local border traffic[2] that
this regime makes life significantly easier for people living near the external
land borders, while ensuring at the same time the internal security of the
Schengen area. The
Commission also stated in the report that given the specific position of Kaliningrad, in order to avoid its isolation from immediate neighbours and facilitate
travel for its inhabitants an amendment of the Local Border Traffic Regulation
was justified. Kaliningrad is a region of the Russian Federation with a
population of almost one million inhabitants that became the only enclave
within the EU surrounded by two Member States as a consequence of the 2004 EU
enlargement. Such amendment would allow the entire Kaliningrad area to be
eligible as a border area in a bilateral agreement between a Member State and the Russian Federation. Even
though the EU-Russian Federation agreement on visa facilitation in force since
2007 already represented a significant step forward to enhance opportunities
for mobility, the local border traffic regime should offer additional
facilitations in particular for frequent needs for travel within the local
area. Border residents would not have to prove sufficient means of subsistence,
the permits might be issued free of charge, or separate lanes and/or specific
border crossing points could be reserved or set up for local border traffic.
Also, all residents of the Kaliningrad area, including the inhabitants of the
city of Kaliningrad, would enjoy these facilitations, whereas some of the
facilitations in the EU-Russian Federation visa facilitation agreement apply to
certain categories of persons only. In
light of this particular situation, an exception to Article 3 paragraph 2 of
Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 was introduced allowing the entire Kaliningrad oblast to be considered as a border area. A
specific border area on the Polish side was included in the eligible border
area as well, in order to facilitate and enhance cooperation between the Kaliningrad oblast on the one hand and major centres in the North of Poland on the other. This
exceptional extension of the border zone in the Kaliningrad area did not affect
the general definition of the eligible border area (the 30/50 km zone) or any
other rules and conditions set in the Local Border Traffic Regulation to
guarantee the security of the entire Schengen area. Council
Regulation 1342/2011/EU of 13 December 2011[3]
amending Regulation 1931/2006/EC entered into force in January 2012. The
bilateral agreement between Poland and the Russian Federation entered into
force on 27 July 2012. Upon
adoption of this Regulation, Council and Commission have issued a joint
declaration, which states as follows (excerpt): '(…)
Particular attention will be paid to security measures pertaining to the
practical implementation of the amended Regulation in the territory of the Republic of Poland. The relevant Polish authorities will ensure the application of
security safeguards, in line with the standards set out in the Regulation. The
Commission will submit biennially and for the first time one year after the
entry into force of this Regulation a report to the European Parliament and the
Council on the implementation and functioning of the present amendment and on
the bilateral agreement concluded in conformity thereof, in particular to
evaluate their impact in the area of security and migration(…).' 2. functioning of the local border
traffic regime in practice This
report has been drawn up on the basis of the information provided by Poland and on the results of the visit of a joint EU-Russian delegation to the border crossing
points of Mamonovo II (RF) and Grzechotki (Poland) in July 2013. According
to Poland, the implementation of the agreement with the Russian Federation on local border traffic, one year after it entered into force, has been very
positive and no serious infringements have been noted. The
entry into force of the new regime was preceded by an important information
campaign. During this campaign, information on local border traffic was
provided to inhabitants of the region in particular through hauliers'
associations, touristic and tour operators. Also, an information brochure in
Polish and Russian was circulated and sent electronically to all local
government bodies whose areas are covered by the LBT agreement. Information
signboards displaying the most important information on the LBT regime were
prepared and placed in appropriate locations such as road border crossings and along
national and district roads. A
number of measures have been adopted to ensure that the rights under the LBT
agreement are being used correctly. This is the case of a special 'LBT' module
directly linked to the LBT database at the Foreigners' Office, which is the
central authority responsible for such matters in Poland. This system allows
officials of the Border Guard to control border crossings and the duration of
stay of holders of LBT permits and to record instances of failure to comply
with the requirements of the agreement or any decisions or measures taken in
association with it. Border
crossing movements under the LBT regime are systematically recorded by both Poland, except for its own citizens, and Russia in their respective entry/exit systems. 2.1. Facilitation measures used
by the Member State 2.1.1. Number of permits issued By
31 January 2013, the Polish Consulate-General in Kaliningrad had received 29
000 applications and issued almost 19 000 permits to cross the border under the
LBT agreement. In the course of 2013, a significant growth of these figures was
noticed with statistics pointing to, as of 31 October, a total of more than 160
000 applications received and more than 140 000 permits issued since the
agreement entered into force. The
main reasons given for permit applications are the wish to make use of consumer
services, tourism and visiting friends and family. Both
parties make effective use of outsourcing to process the majority of LBT permit
applications. An
external entity selected by means of a tender procedure has set up application
centres in Kaliningrad, Chernyakhovsk and Sovetsk. These application centres
receive around 90% of the applications, with the rest being received directly
by the Consulate. Russia has established outsourced application centres in Olsztyn and Gdansk, which receive two thirds of all LBT permit applications in Poland. The waiting period for filing applications is around two weeks. As
at the end of January 2013, the Russian Consulate-General in Gdansk had
received 15 500 applications and issued 14 500 permits to Polish citizens. The
total number of permits issued by Russian authorities was 22 589 by August
2013. Polish
local border permits are issued in ID1 format and at the moment do not contain
contact chips. The Commission is currently assessing the compliance of all
existing LBT agreements with the requirements set out in Council Regulation
(EC) 1030/2002 of 13 June 2002[4]
laying down a uniform format for residence permits for third country nationals,
including the use of biometrics. In accordance with the new Polish Act on
Foreigners of 12 December 2013, the biometrics will be introduced in the LBT
permits as of 1 May 2014. 2.2. Use made of the bilateral
agreement by border residents Since
the parties began issuing LBT permits, a constant increase has been noted in
the number of persons crossing the border under such permits. In 2012, the
total amount of traffic of persons across the Polish border from the
Kaliningrad Oblast reached the level, which it had before Poland joined the Schengen area, which is seen also as a result of the implementation of the LBT
agreement. 2.2.1. Number of crossings From
July 2012 to January 2013, more than 1.2 million non-Polish nationals
crossed the Polish-Russian border to Poland with 43 653 persons
(around 3.6%) crossing on the basis of LBT permits. December 2012 saw the
number of these persons increase by almost 100% as compared to the previous
month. In January 2013, non-Polish nationals crossing the border on the basis
of LBT permits accounted for around 8% of the total number of non-Polish
travellers in the area. These numbers have grown exponentially in the course of
2013 with more than 400 000 non-Polish nationals under LBT permits entering Poland by October, which represent 31% of the total traffic to Poland at the land border with Russia. From November 2012 to end of January 2013, there were more than 150 000
crossings under LBT permits by Polish citizens, accounting for around 31.2% of
the total traffic of Polish citizens. This number of crossings was already over
350 000 until the end of October 2013. 2.2.2. Cases of abuse and
withdrawals of permits Neither
Russia nor Poland has so far reported serious infringements of the rules on
LBT stays in the border areas, including cases where the permitted length of
stay would have been exceeded or of citizens being recorded as perpetrators or
victims of criminal offences. Overall only 25 cases[5] of
refusal of entry have been signalled by Poland. According
to the information provided to date, only 14 cases have come to light since the
agreement came into force. Nine cases concerned Russian citizens who were found
outside the border area and the other five concerned persons who have stayed
beyond the authorised period. Those foreign nationals had their permits
revoked, were fined, and were ordered to leave the territory of Poland and banned from entering it again for a period of six months. Before the entry into
force of the LBT agreement, the vicinity of border crossings (on the Russian
side) was marked by incidents involving people waiting for entry, which have
stopped since then. The
Commission has not received any report by the Member States or complaint from
other stakeholders on possible abuses of the system. The
information available suggests that the LBT Agreement between Poland and Russia decreased the numbers of illegal border crossings or attempts of illegal border
crossing at Polish–Russian border. 2.3. Passenger flows at the border There
are no specific lanes dedicated only to LBT beneficiaries in the Polish border
crossing points along the border with Russia. According
to Poland, the queues at border crossing points are temporary and connected
with the build-up of personal traffic at certain hours of the day or week.
Despite the 80% increase this year in the number of vehicles being cleared,
there are no queues during 95% of customs shifts and on average border check
takes no more than an hour in total. At peak crossing times, checks can take
around two hours. The overall trend is that border traffic is increasing while
the average time to carry out checks at border crossing points is falling. Training
has been organised by Poland on the rights and responsibilities under the LBT
rules for individual institutions, bodies and services involved. This took the
form of training sessions for police officers from all the districts in the
area, officials of the Warmińsko-Mazurskie Road Transport Inspectorate and
railway police officers. The Polish Consulate-General in Kaliningrad organised training
for VFS Global, the company that was awarded the contract to receive
applications and issue the LBT permits. The
LBT Agreement with the Russian Federation is also a standard element of the
training provided to consular staff by the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3. Calculation of the duration of stay
in the border area According
to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-254/11
(Shomodi), Article 5 of the LBT Regulation means that the holder of the
local border permit is entitled, on each entry, to stay within the border area
for an uninterrupted period of up to three months. Moreover, this person has a
new right to the same period of stay of up to three months each time his/her
stay was interrupted. Article 4 of the Polish/Russian LBT agreement authorises
the person to stay in the border area of the other Contracting Party for up to
30 days at a time, ‘but no longer than a total of 90 days during each 6 months
from the day of the first crossing of the border. It is therefore more
restrictive towards LBT holders than what the Regulation allows. Discussions
are on-going between the Commission and Poland to ensure that the Agreement is
applied in accordance with the judgment. 4. Conclusion Given
the short time since its entry into force, any assessment on the implementation
and functioning of the Agreement can only be limited at this point. In
the absence of reports of abuse and from the available information, the LBT
regime in the specific case of Kaliningrad appears to be functioning well,
contributing to an increase in the border crossings of people living in the
border area. According
to the regional and local authorities in Poland, implementation of the
agreement has resulted in an increase in the number of people coming to Poland
to shop, for tourism, or for medical and care services while it has had
positive effects on the economy of these areas. This
positive assessment of the functioning of the agreement is shared by both
parties, as confirmed at the Polish-Russian inter-ministerial review held in Gdansk on 29 November 2012 and stated by the joint mission in July 2013. The
Commission will continue to follow closely the implementation and functioning
of the Agreement. To this end, it calls for the collaboration of the Member
States and recalls the need to report any abuse promptly. Meanwhile
the Commission encourages Poland and the Russian Federation to continue its
efforts to reduce waiting times at the border while ensuring that all
safeguards of the system are fully respected. [1] Regulation No 1931/2006 of 20 December 2006, OJ L 405,
30.12.2006, p.1. [2] COM(2011)47 final 3
OJ L 347, 30.12.2011, p.41 [4] OJ L 157, 15.06.2002, p.1 [5] 7 cases: missing or falisied LBT permit 8 cases: alert in the SIS for
refusal of entry 10 cases: exceeding the maximum
duration of stay