Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62024CN0353

    Case C-353/24, EUROPARK LATVIA and SKIDATA: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 15 May 2024 – SIA EUROPARK LATVIA, SKIDATA GmbH v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

    OJ C, C/2024/4450, 22.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4450/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4450/oj

    European flag

    Official Journal
    of the European Union

    EN

    C series


    C/2024/4450

    22.7.2024

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 15 May 2024 – SIA EUROPARK LATVIA, SKIDATA GmbH v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

    (Case C-353/24, EUROPARK LATVIA and SKIDATA)

    (C/2024/4450)

    Language of the case: Latvian

    Referring court

    Administratīvā rajona tiesa

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicants: SIA EUROPARK LATVIA, SKIDATA GmbH

    Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

    Interveners: SIA 19 points, SIA Ernst & Young Baltic

    Questions referred

    (1)

    Must Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations be interpreted as meaning that a rule of law requiring a maintenance service provider to supply the source code for a registered software package to a conformity assessment body may be included within the concept of ‘technical regulations’, the drafts of which must be notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 8(1) of the aforementioned directive? (1)

    (2)

    Must Article 34 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that the requirement to supply the source code for a registered software package to a conformity assessment body may be regarded as a measure having an effect equivalent to a quantitative restriction on imports?

    (3)

    If the foregoing question is answered in the affirmative, may that measure be regarded as a proportionate means of ensuring the effectiveness of fiscal supervision?


    (1)   OJ 1998 L 204, p 37.


    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4450/oj

    ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


    Top