Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62023TN1117

    Case T-1117/23: Action brought on 24 November 2023 — Usmanov v Council

    OJ C, C/2024/768, 22.1.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/768/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/768/oj

    European flag

    Official Journal
    of the European Union

    EN

    Series C


    C/2024/768

    22.1.2024

    Action brought on 24 November 2023 — Usmanov v Council

    (Case T-1117/23)

    (C/2024/768)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Alisher Usmanov (Tashkent, Uzbekistan) (represented by: D. Rovetta, M. Campa, M. Moretto, V. Villante and M. Pirovano, lawyers)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    1)

    Annul

    Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1767 of 13 September 2023 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (1), and

    Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1765 of 13 September 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (2);

    2)

    Order the Council to bear the costs of the proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging distortion of evidence and of the relevant facts and lack or reliability, specificity and probative value of the evidence relied upon by the Council.

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging that the Council committed a manifest error of assessment.

    3.

    Third plea in law, alleging the breach of the right to effective judicial protection as well as of the duty to state reasons by the Council.

    4.

    Fourth plea in law, alleging violation of the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination.

    5.

    Fifth plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of proportionality.

    6.

    Sixth plea in law, alleging violation of fundamental rights to private life and property.


    (1)   OJ 2023, L 226, p. 104.

    (2)   OJ 2023, L 226, p. 3.


    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/768/oj

    ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


    Top