This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023TN1105
Case T-1105/23: Action brought on 24 November 2023 — Abramovich v Council
Case T-1105/23: Action brought on 24 November 2023 — Abramovich v Council
Case T-1105/23: Action brought on 24 November 2023 — Abramovich v Council
OJ C, C/2024/1867, 11.3.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1867/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Official Journal |
EN Series C |
C/2024/1867 |
11.3.2024 |
Action brought on 24 November 2023 — Abramovich v Council
(Case T-1105/23)
(C/2024/1867)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich (Nemchinovo, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, C. Zatschler, S. Bonifassi, J. Goffin, J. Bastien and M. Brésart, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
principally,
— |
declare unlawful the listing criterion laid down in Articles 1(1)(e) and 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP and in Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, in so far as it refers to ‘leading businesspersons operating in Russia and their immediate family members, or other natural persons, benefitting from them, or businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation, which is responsible for the annexation of Crimea and the destabilisation of Ukraine’, and, in consequence:
|
in the alternative, on the basis of the other pleas in law raised by the applicant,
— |
order the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1767 of 13 September 2023, in so far as it extends the application of the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/429 of 15 March 2022 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/427 of 15 March 2022; |
— |
order the annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1765 of 13 September 2023, in so far as it extends the application of the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/429 of 15 March 2022 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/427 of 15 March 2022; |
— |
order the Council to pay EUR 1 000 000 on a provisional basis in respect of the non-material damage suffered by the applicant; |
— |
order the Council to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.
1. |
First plea, raising a plea of illegality in respect of new criterion (g) as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2023/1094 and Regulation (EU) 2023/1089. |
2. |
Second plea, alleging a failure to observe the applicant’s fundamental rights. |
3. |
Third plea, alleging a manifest error of assessment. |
4. |
Fourth plea, alleging a failure to observe the obligation to state reasons and the right to judicial protection. |
5. |
Fifth plea, alleging a failure to observe the principle of proportionality. |
6. |
Sixth plea, alleging a failure to observe the right to be heard. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1867/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)