Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN0298

    Case T-298/23: Action brought on 24 May 2023 — Timchenko v Council

    OJ C 296, 21.8.2023, p. 35–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.8.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 296/35

    Action brought on 24 May 2023 — Timchenko v Council

    (Case T-298/23)

    (2023/C 296/39)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Elena Petrovna Timchenko (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, L. Burguin, S. Bonifassi, E. Fedorova and J. Goffin, lawyers)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims the Court should:

    —

    annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/572 of 13 March 2023 in so far as it extends the application of the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022;

    —

    annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/571 of 13 March 2023 in so far as it extends the application of the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022;

    —

    order the Council to pay the sum of EUR 1 000 000, on a provisional basis, in respect of the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;

    —

    order the Council to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law that are identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-297/23, Timchenko v Council.

    Top