Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62022TN0364

    Case T-364/22: Action brought on 18 June 2022 — Shulgin v Council

    OJ C 303, 8.8.2022, p. 55–55 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    8.8.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 303/55

    Action brought on 18 June 2022 — Shulgin v Council

    (Case T-364/22)

    (2022/C 303/70)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Shulgin (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, F. Bélot, A. Guillerme and L. Burguin, lawyers)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul Council Decision 2022/582/CFSP of 8 April 2022, (1) in so far as it includes the applicant’s name at No 911 of the annex to that decision;

    —

    annul the Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022, (2) in so far as it includes the applicant’s name at No 911 of Annex I to that regulation;

    —

    order the Council to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea, alleging infringement of the right to effective judicial protection and of the obligation to give reasons.

    2.

    Second plea, alleging manifest error of assessment as regards the grounds given by the Council.

    3.

    Third plea, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality and infringement of fundamental rights.

    4.

    Fourth plea, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment.

    (1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 110, p. 55).

    (2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 110, p. 3).

    Top