This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TA0155
Case T-155/22: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ v EUIPO — Stayer Ibérica (STAYER) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark STAYER — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15 and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Classification of the goods in respect of which genuine use has been shown)
Case T-155/22: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ v EUIPO — Stayer Ibérica (STAYER) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark STAYER — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15 and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Classification of the goods in respect of which genuine use has been shown)
Case T-155/22: Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ v EUIPO — Stayer Ibérica (STAYER) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark STAYER — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15 and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Classification of the goods in respect of which genuine use has been shown)
OJ C 35, 30.1.2023, p. 59–59
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.1.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 35/59 |
Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ v EUIPO — Stayer Ibérica (STAYER)
(Case T-155/22) (1)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark STAYER - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15 and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Classification of the goods in respect of which genuine use has been shown)
(2023/C 35/72)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: N. Bürglen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Stayer Ibérica, SA (Pinto, Spain) (represented by: P. Creta, A. Lanzarini, A. Sponzilli, B. Costa and M. Lazzarotto, lawyers)
Re:
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 December 2021 (Case R 931/2021-1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ to pay the costs. |