This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CN0475
Case C-475/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 15 July 2022 — Maxi Mobility Spain, S. L. U. v Comunidad de Madrid, Asociación Nacional del Taxi, Asociación Taxi Project 2.0
Case C-475/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 15 July 2022 — Maxi Mobility Spain, S. L. U. v Comunidad de Madrid, Asociación Nacional del Taxi, Asociación Taxi Project 2.0
Case C-475/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 15 July 2022 — Maxi Mobility Spain, S. L. U. v Comunidad de Madrid, Asociación Nacional del Taxi, Asociación Taxi Project 2.0
OJ C 472, 12.12.2022, p. 29–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.12.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 472/29 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 15 July 2022 — Maxi Mobility Spain, S. L. U. v Comunidad de Madrid, Asociación Nacional del Taxi, Asociación Taxi Project 2.0
(Case C-475/22)
(2022/C 472/32)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Tribunal Supremo
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Maxi Mobility Spain, S. L. U.
Respondents: Comunidad de Madrid, Asociación Nacional del Taxi, Asociación Taxi Project 2.0
Questions referred
Spanish national legislation considers the maintenance of a taxi service to be a form of urban transport using vehicles with driver in the public interest and therefore subjects it to intense administrative regulation in order to guarantee quality objectives, user protection, transport policy and environmental policy, including fare control. In view of that national legislation,
|
1. |
Is it compatible with the principle of freedom of establishment to impose limitations on other urban transport services using vehicles with driver, such as PHV, subject to the principle of proportionality, in order to ensure the compatibility and complementarity of those other models of the same activity with that of taxis? |
|
2. |
If the answer to the previous question is in the affirmative, is it compatible with the principle of freedom of establishment to impose, as regards urban transport services using vehicles with driver other than taxi services, such as PHV, the specific restrictive measure of establishing a maximum ratio of authorisations in respect of taxi licences, such as the 1/30 ratio laid down in the Spanish legislation, subject in its application by the competent administration to the principle of proportionality? |
|
3. |
Is the restrictive measure for PHV of establishing a 1/30 licence ratio as described in the previous question compatible with the prohibition on State aid under Article 107 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union? |