Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Itinerant Show Room Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ITINERANT – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a singing duck in a circle – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity – Reputation – Link – Undue advantage – Lack of due cause – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Document produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case T-416/21.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.
Itinerant Show Room Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ITINERANT – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a singing duck in a circle – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity – Reputation – Link – Undue advantage – Lack of due cause – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Document produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Inadmissibility.
Case T-416/21.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.
Itinerant Show Room Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ITINERANT – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a singing duck in a circle – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity – Reputation – Link – Undue advantage – Lack of due cause – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Document produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Inadmissibility.
Case T-416/21.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:560