This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TJ0146
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 March 2022.#Vetpharma Animal Health, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark DELTATIC – Earlier EU word mark DELTA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-146/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 March 2022.
Vetpharma Animal Health, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark DELTATIC – Earlier EU word mark DELTA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.
Case T-146/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 March 2022.
Vetpharma Animal Health, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark DELTATIC – Earlier EU word mark DELTA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.
Case T-146/21.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:159