Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CN0052

    Case C-52/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 28 January 2021 — Pharmacie populaire — La Sauvegarde SCRL v État belge

    OJ C 128, 12.4.2021, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    12.4.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 128/22


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 28 January 2021 — Pharmacie populaire — La Sauvegarde SCRL v État belge

    (Case C-52/21)

    (2021/C 128/27)

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Cour d’appel de Liège

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Pharmacie populaire — La Sauvegarde SCRL

    Respondent: État belge

    Question referred

    Is Article 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be interpreted as precluding legislation, or a national practice, under which companies established in one Member State which use services of companies established in another Member State are required, in order to avoid a corporation tax levy of 100 % or 50 % of the sums invoiced by the latter, to complete and submit to the tax authorities individual fee forms and summary statements relating to those expenses whereas, if they use the services of resident companies, they are under no such obligation in order to avoid that levy?


    Top