This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CA0329
Case C-329/21, DIGI Communications: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — DIGI Communications NV v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Hivatala (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Telecommunications — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) — Article 4(1) — Directive 2002/20/EC (Authorisation Directive) — Article 7 — Award of rights to use frequencies — Auction procedure — Holding company not registered as a provider of electronic communications services in the Member State concerned — Exclusion from the award procedure — Right of appeal against the award decision)
Case C-329/21, DIGI Communications: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — DIGI Communications NV v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Hivatala (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Telecommunications — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) — Article 4(1) — Directive 2002/20/EC (Authorisation Directive) — Article 7 — Award of rights to use frequencies — Auction procedure — Holding company not registered as a provider of electronic communications services in the Member State concerned — Exclusion from the award procedure — Right of appeal against the award decision)
Case C-329/21, DIGI Communications: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — DIGI Communications NV v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Hivatala (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Telecommunications — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) — Article 4(1) — Directive 2002/20/EC (Authorisation Directive) — Article 7 — Award of rights to use frequencies — Auction procedure — Holding company not registered as a provider of electronic communications services in the Member State concerned — Exclusion from the award procedure — Right of appeal against the award decision)
OJ C 205, 12.6.2023, p. 4–5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.6.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 205/4 |
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — DIGI Communications NV v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Hivatala
(Case C-329/21, (1) DIGI Communications)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Telecommunications - Electronic communications networks and services - Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive) - Article 4(1) - Directive 2002/20/EC (Authorisation Directive) - Article 7 - Award of rights to use frequencies - Auction procedure - Holding company not registered as a provider of electronic communications services in the Member State concerned - Exclusion from the award procedure - Right of appeal against the award decision)
(2023/C 205/05)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Fővárosi Törvényszék
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: DIGI Communications NV
Defendant: Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Hivatala
Intervening party: Magyar Telekom Nyrt.
Operative part of the judgment
|
1. |
Article 7 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services, as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that:
|
|
2. |
Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, as amended by Directive 2009/140, read in conjunction with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as conferring a right of appeal on an undertaking:
|