This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020CN0195
Case C-195/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2020 — XC
Case C-195/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2020 — XC
Case C-195/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2020 — XC
OJ C 230, 13.7.2020, p. 18–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
13.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 230/18 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2020 — XC
(Case C-195/20)
(2020/C 230/24)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Bundesgerichtshof
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: XC
Other party to the proceedings: Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof
Question referred
Is Article 27(2) and (3) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, (1) as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, (2) to be interpreted as meaning that the specialty rule does not preclude a measure involving deprivation of liberty for an offence committed prior to surrender other than that on which the surrender is based if the person voluntarily left the territory of the issuing Member State after the surrender, was subsequently surrendered again by another executing Member State to the territory of the issuing Member State pursuant to a new European arrest warrant, and the second executing Member State gave its consent to prosecution, sentencing and execution in respect of that other offence?