Case C-318/20: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Colt Technology Services SpA, Wind Tre SpA, Telecom Italia SpA, Voidafone Italia SpA, Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Ministero dell’economia e delle finanze v Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Ministero dell’economia e delle finanze, Wind Tre SpA, Procura generale della Repubblica presso la Corte d’appello di Reggio Calabria, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Cagliari, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Roma, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Locri (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality — National legislation on pricing of interception activities ordered by judicial authorities — Failure to take into account the principle of full reimbursement of the costs of telecommunications operators — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory framework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

Case C-318/20: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Colt Technology Services SpA, Wind Tre SpA, Telecom Italia SpA, Voidafone Italia SpA, Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Ministero dell’economia e delle finanze v Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Ministero dell’economia e delle finanze, Wind Tre SpA, Procura generale della Repubblica presso la Corte d’appello di Reggio Calabria, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Cagliari, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Roma, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Locri (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality — National legislation on pricing of interception activities ordered by judicial authorities — Failure to take into account the principle of full reimbursement of the costs of telecommunications operators — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory framework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

Case C-318/20: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Colt Technology Services SpA, Wind Tre SpA, Telecom Italia SpA, Voidafone Italia SpA, Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Ministero dell’economia e delle finanze v Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Ministero dell’economia e delle finanze, Wind Tre SpA, Procura generale della Repubblica presso la Corte d’appello di Reggio Calabria, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Cagliari, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Roma, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Locri (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality — National legislation on pricing of interception activities ordered by judicial authorities — Failure to take into account the principle of full reimbursement of the costs of telecommunications operators — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory framework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

OJ C 79, 8.3.2021, p. 18–18 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)