Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#Production Christian Gallimard v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PCG CALLIGRAM CHRISTIAN GALLIMARD – Earlier EU word marks GALLIMARD – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Conceptual comparison – Surnames – Independent distinctive role – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-863/19.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2020.
Production Christian Gallimard v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PCG CALLIGRAM CHRISTIAN GALLIMARD – Earlier EU word marks GALLIMARD – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Conceptual comparison – Surnames – Independent distinctive role – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-863/19.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2020.
Production Christian Gallimard v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PCG CALLIGRAM CHRISTIAN GALLIMARD – Earlier EU word marks GALLIMARD – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Conceptual comparison – Surnames – Independent distinctive role – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-863/19.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:632