Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Heitec AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark HEITEC – No account taken of evidence submitted before the Cancellation Division and before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rule 40(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-520/19.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.
Heitec AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark HEITEC – No account taken of evidence submitted before the Cancellation Division and before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rule 40(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).
Case T-520/19.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.
Heitec AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark HEITEC – No account taken of evidence submitted before the Cancellation Division and before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rule 40(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).
Case T-520/19.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:66