This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TJ0537
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission.#Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance – Grants – Investigations by OLAF – Administrative penalty – Exclusion, for a period of two years, from public procurement procedures and from procedures for the award of grants financed from the general budget of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 – Principle of good administration – Legitimate expectations – Unlimited jurisdiction – Proportionality of the penalty.#Case T-537/18.
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2022.
Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission.
Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance – Grants – Investigations by OLAF – Administrative penalty – Exclusion, for a period of two years, from public procurement procedures and from procedures for the award of grants financed from the general budget of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 – Principle of good administration – Legitimate expectations – Unlimited jurisdiction – Proportionality of the penalty.
Case T-537/18.
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 December 2022.
Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission.
Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance – Grants – Investigations by OLAF – Administrative penalty – Exclusion, for a period of two years, from public procurement procedures and from procedures for the award of grants financed from the general budget of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 – Principle of good administration – Legitimate expectations – Unlimited jurisdiction – Proportionality of the penalty.
Case T-537/18.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:852