This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0328
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 October 2018.#Ian Paice v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark DEEP PURPLE — Earlier non-registered mark DEEP PURPLE — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rules governing common-law action for passing-off — No likelihood of misrepresentation.#Case T-328/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 October 2018.
Ian Paice v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark DEEP PURPLE — Earlier non-registered mark DEEP PURPLE — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rules governing common-law action for passing-off — No likelihood of misrepresentation.
Case T-328/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 October 2018.
Ian Paice v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark DEEP PURPLE — Earlier non-registered mark DEEP PURPLE — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rules governing common-law action for passing-off — No likelihood of misrepresentation.
Case T-328/16.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:649