Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2017.#PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark GAPPOL — Earlier EU word mark GAP — Cross-appeal — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Reputation — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-411/15.

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2017.
PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark GAPPOL — Earlier EU word mark GAP — Cross-appeal — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Reputation — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-411/15.

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2017.
PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark GAPPOL — Earlier EU word mark GAP — Cross-appeal — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Reputation — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-411/15.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2017:689