Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62015CN0684

    Case C-684/15: Action brought on 18 December 2015 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

    OJ C 98, 14.3.2016, p. 20–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    14.3.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 98/20

    Action brought on 18 December 2015 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

    (Case C-684/15)

    (2016/C 098/26)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Heller and K.-Ph. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

    Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    declare that, by not adopting every law, regulation and administrative provision necessary for compliance with Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, (1) or, in any event, by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 130(1) of that directive;

    —

    impose on the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU, a penalty payment of EUR 6 700 per day from the date of delivery of the judgment in the case for failure to fulfil the obligation to communicate the transposition measures of Directive 2014/59/EU;

    —

    order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The period prescribed for the transposition of Directive 2014/59/EU expired on 31 December 2014.

    (1)  OJ 2014 L 173, p. 190.

    Top