EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0328
Case T-328/14: Action brought on 13 May 2014 — Jannatian v Council
Case T-328/14: Action brought on 13 May 2014 — Jannatian v Council
Case T-328/14: Action brought on 13 May 2014 — Jannatian v Council
OJ C 212, 7.7.2014, p. 40–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
7.7.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 212/40 |
Action brought on 13 May 2014 — Jannatian v Council
(Case T-328/14)
2014/C 212/52
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Mahmoud Jannatian (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: I. Smith Monnerville and S. Monnerville, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
Annul insofar as they concern the applicant: (i) Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ L 195, p. 39); (ii) Council Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ L 281, p. 81); (iii) Council Regulation (EU) No. 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 423/2007 (OJ L 281, p. 1); (iv) (EU) Regulation No. 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Council Regulation (EU) No. 961/2010 (OJ L 88, p. 1); (v) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 350/2012 of 23 April 2012 implementing (EU) Regulation No. 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ L 110, p. 17); (vi) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 709/2012 of 2 August 2012 implementing (EU) Regulation No. 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ l.208, p. 2); (vii) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 945/2012 of 15 October 2012 implementing (EU) Regulation No. 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ L 282, p. 16); (viii) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 1264/2012 of 21 December 2012 implementing (EU) Regulation No. 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ L 356, p. 55); (ix) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 522/2013 of 6 June 2013 implementing (EU) Regulation No. 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ L 156, p. 3); (x) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 1203/2013 of 26 November 2013 implementing (EU) Regulation No. 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ L 316, p. 1); and (xi) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 397/2014 of 16 April 2014 implementing (EU) Regulation No. 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ L 356, p. 1); |
— |
Order the Council to pay damages for the losses incurred due to the applicant’s wrongful listing in the amount of 40 000 Euros; |
— |
Order the Council to pay all of the costs of the present proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging lack of authority of the Council
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging violation to the obligation to state the reasons
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging an infringement of the applicant’s fundamental rights
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging lack of evidence against the Applicant
|
5. |
Fifth plea in law, alleging factual inaccuracy
|
6. |
Sixth plea in law, alleging error of law
|
7. |
Seventh plea in law, alleging manifest error in the assessment of the facts and violation of the proportionality principle
|