Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TA0469

    Case T-469/13: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2016 — Generics (UK) v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for antidepressant medicinal products containing the active pharmaceutical ingredient citalopram — Concept of restriction of competition ‘by object’ — Potential competition — Generic medicinal products — Barriers to market entry resulting from the existence of patents — Agreements concluded between a patent holder and a generic undertaking — Error of law — Error of assessment — Rights of defence — Fines)

    OJ C 383, 17.10.2016, p. 11–11 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    17.10.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 383/11


    Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2016 — Generics (UK) v Commission

    (Case T-469/13) (1)

    ((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for antidepressant medicinal products containing the active pharmaceutical ingredient citalopram - Concept of restriction of competition ‘by object’ - Potential competition - Generic medicinal products - Barriers to market entry resulting from the existence of patents - Agreements concluded between a patent holder and a generic undertaking - Error of law - Error of assessment - Rights of defence - Fines))

    (2016/C 383/15)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Generics (UK) Ltd (Potters Bar, United Kingdom) (represented by: I. Vandenborre and T. Goetz, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by J. Bourke, F. Castilla Contreras and T. Vecchi, and subsequently by F. Castilla Contreras, T. Vecchi, B. Mongin and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents, assisted by S. Kingston, Barrister)

    Re:

    Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 3803 final of 19 June 2013 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39226 — Lundbeck), and for reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Generics (UK) Ltd to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.


    Top