This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TN0276
Case T-276/12: Action brought on 15 June 2012 — Chyzh and Others v Council
Case T-276/12: Action brought on 15 June 2012 — Chyzh and Others v Council
Case T-276/12: Action brought on 15 June 2012 — Chyzh and Others v Council
OJ C 250, 18.8.2012, p. 18–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
18.8.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 250/18 |
Action brought on 15 June 2012 — Chyzh and Others v Council
(Case T-276/12)
2012/C 250/33
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Yury Aleksandrovich Chyzh (Minsk, Belarus); Triple TAA (Minsk, Belarus); NefteKhimTrading STAA (Minsk, Belarus); Askargoterminal ZAT (Minsk, Belarus); Bereza Silicate Products Plant AAT (Bereza District, Belarus); Variant TAA (Berezovsky District, Belarus); Triple-Dekor STAA (Minsk, Belarus); KvartsMelProm SZAT (Khotislav, Belarus); Altersolutions SZAT (Minsk, Belarus); Prostoremarket SZAT (Minsk, Belarus); AquaTriple STAA (Minsk, Belarus); Rakovsky brovar TAA (Minsk, Belarus); TriplePharm STAA (Logoysk, Belarus); and Triple-Veles TAA (Molodechno, Belarus) (represented by: D. O’Keeffe, Solicitor, and B. Evtimov, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
— |
Annul Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 265/2012 of 23 March 2012 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ L 87, p. 37), in so far as it concerns the applicants; |
— |
Annul Council implementing Decision 2012/171/CFSP of 23 March 2012 implementing Decision 2010/639/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (JO L 87, p. 95), in so far as it concerns the applicants; and |
— |
Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of their action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging
|