This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011FA0042
Case F-42/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2012 — Honnefelder v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Annulment of the decision of a selection board — Implementation of a judgment — Principle of legality — Plea of illegality against a decision to reopen the procedure for an open competition)
Case F-42/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2012 — Honnefelder v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Annulment of the decision of a selection board — Implementation of a judgment — Principle of legality — Plea of illegality against a decision to reopen the procedure for an open competition)
Case F-42/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2012 — Honnefelder v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Annulment of the decision of a selection board — Implementation of a judgment — Principle of legality — Plea of illegality against a decision to reopen the procedure for an open competition)
OJ C 46, 16.2.2013, p. 28–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
16.2.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 46/28 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 December 2012 — Honnefelder v Commission
(Case F-42/11) (1)
(Civil service - Open competition - Annulment of the decision of a selection board - Implementation of a judgment - Principle of legality - Plea of illegality against a decision to reopen the procedure for an open competition)
2013/C 46/54
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Stephanie Honnefelder (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Bode, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by B. Eggers and P. Pecho, Agents, and subsequently by B. Eggers, lawyer)
Re:
Civil service — Application for annulment of the decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list for competition EPSO/AD/26/05
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Ms Honnefelder to bear two-thirds of her own costs. |
|
3. |
Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay one third of Ms Honnefelder’s costs. |
(1) OJ C 183, 25.6.2011, p. 34.