Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62010CO0613

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 April 2011.
Danilo Debiasi v Agenzia delle Entrate, Ufficio di Parma.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma - Italy.
Reference for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility.
Case C-613/10.

European Court Reports 2011 I-00065*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2011:266





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 April 2011 – Debiasi v Agenzia delle Entrate, Ufficio di Parma

(Case C-613/10)

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility

Preliminary rulings – Admissibility – Questions referred without sufficient information on the factual and legislative context – Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 92(1) and 103(1)) (see paras 19-32, operative part)

Application for

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma – Interpretation of Art. 13, section A, of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) – Deduction of input tax – Public or private health establishments engaged in an exempt activity – National legislation excluding the deduction of tax referring to the purchase of goods or services used in those exempt activities.

Operative part

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma (Italy) by decision of 7 July 2010 is manifestly inadmissible.

Top