Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008CO0404

    Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 September 2009.
    Investitionsbank Sachsen-Anhalt - Anstalt der Norddeutschen Landesbank - Girozentrale v Bezirksrevisorin beim Landgericht Magdeburg für die Landeskasse des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt.
    References for a preliminary ruling: Oberlandesgericht Naumburg - Germany.
    Preliminary references - Manifest inadmissibility.
    Joined cases C-404/08 and C-409/08.

    European Court Reports 2009 I-00144*

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2009:563





    Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 September 2009 – Investitionsbank Sachsen-Anhalt v Bezirksrevisorin beim Landgericht Magdeburg für die Landeskasse des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt

    (Joined Cases C‑404/08 and C-409/08)

    Preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility

    Preliminary rulings – Admissibility – Questions referred without sufficient information on the factual and legislative context – Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 234 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 92(1) and 103) (see paras 25-40)

    Re:

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Oberlandesgericht Naumburg – Interpretation of Article 86 EC, in conjunction with Article 81(1)(a) and (d) and 81(2) EC – National rules granting exemption from court fees to an investment bank established by the Land .

    Operative part:

    The references for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Naumburg made by decisions of 1 and 2 September 2008 are manifestly inadmissible.

    Top