EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006TJ0400

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 16 September 2009.
Zero Industry Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community mark zerorh+ - Earlier national figurative and word marks zero - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity between products - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).
Case T-400/06.

European Court Reports 2009 II-00150*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2009:331





Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 16 September 2009 – Zero Industry v OHIM – zero Germany (zerorh+)

(Case T-400/06)

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for figurative Community mark zerorh+ – Earlier national figurative and word marks zero – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity between products – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 25-28, 77-89)

Re:

ACTION for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 October 2006 (Case R 958/2005-1) concerning opposition proceedings between zero Germany GmbH & Co. KG and Zero Industry Srl.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Zero Industry Srl

Community trade mark sought:

Figurative mark ‘zerorh+’ for goods in Classes 9, 18 and 25 – Application No 2004547

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

zero Germany GmbH & Co. KG, formerly zero International Holding GmbH & Co. KG

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

The national figurative mark ‘zero’ for goods in Classes 18 and 25 and the national word mark ‘zero’ for goods in Class 9

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Opposition upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed


Operative part

The Court:

1.      Dismisses the action;

2.      Orders Zero Industry Srl to pay the costs.

Top