This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62006TJ0243
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2008. # Promat GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community figurative mark PROMAT - Earlier Community figurative mark PROMA - Partial refusal to register - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94). # Case T-243/06.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2008.
Promat GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community figurative mark PROMAT - Earlier Community figurative mark PROMA - Partial refusal to register - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94).
Case T-243/06.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2008.
Promat GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community figurative mark PROMAT - Earlier Community figurative mark PROMA - Partial refusal to register - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94).
Case T-243/06.
European Court Reports 2008 II-00167*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2008:333
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2008 – Promat v OHIM – Puertas Proma (PROMAT)
(Case T-243/06)
Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Application for Community figurative mark PROMAT – Earlier Community figurative mark PROMA – Partial refusal to register – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see para. 54)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 May 2006 (Case R 1059/2005-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Puertas Proma SAL and Promat GmbH. |
Information relating to the case
Applicant for the Community trade mark: |
Promat GmbH |
Community trade mark sought: |
Figurative mark PROMAT relating to goods and services in Classes 1, 3, 6 to 12, 14, 16, 17, 20 to 22, 25 and 37 – Application No 932202 |
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: |
Puertas Proma, SAL |
Mark or sign cited in opposition: |
In particular, figurative mark PROMA designating goods and services in Classes 6, 20 and 39 (Community mark No 239384) |
Decision of the Opposition Division: |
Opposition upheld |
Decision of the Board of Appeal: |
Appeal dismissed |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Promat GmbH to pay the costs. |