Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62003TJ0032

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 8 March 2005.
Leder & Schuh AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community mark.
Case T-32/03.

European Court Reports 2005 II-00001*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2005:82





Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 8 March 2005 − Leder & Schuh v OHIM – Schuhpark Fascies (JELLO SCHUHPARK)

(Case T-32/03)

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Earlier national word mark ‘Schuhpark’ – Application for Community word mark ‘JELLO SCHUHPARK’ – Relative ground for refusal – Partial refusal to register – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Word Marks JELLO SCHUHPARK and Schuhpark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see para. 51)

Re:

ACTION against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 November 2002, in the corrected version of 9 December 2002 (Case R 494/1999-3), relating to opposition proceedings between Schuhpark Fascies GmbH and Leder & Schuh AG.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Leder & Schuh AG

Community trade mark sought:

The word mark ‘JELLO SCHUHPARK’ for goods in Classes 18, 25 and 28 – Application No 107367

Proprietor of mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Schuhpark Fascies GmbH

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

German word mark ‘Schuhpark’ for goods in Class 25

Decision of the Opposition Division

Dismissal of the applicant’s application for goods in Class 18. Dismissal of the opposition as to the remainder

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal brought by the applicant


Operative part

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the application;

2.

Orders the applicant to bear the costs.

Top