This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 61999CJ0195
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 October 2003. # Krupp Hoesch Stahl AG v Commission of the European Communities. # Appeal - Agreements and concerted practices - European producers of beams. # Case C-195/99 P.
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 October 2003.
Krupp Hoesch Stahl AG v Commission of the European Communities.
Appeal - Agreements and concerted practices - European producers of beams.
Case C-195/99 P.
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 October 2003.
Krupp Hoesch Stahl AG v Commission of the European Communities.
Appeal - Agreements and concerted practices - European producers of beams.
Case C-195/99 P.
European Court Reports 2003 I-10937
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:528
«(Appeal – Agreements and concerted practices – European producers of beams)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(Art. 32d(1) CS; ECSC Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 51)
(ECSC Treaty, Arts 33 and 65; Arts 81 EC and 82 EC)
( ECSC Treaty, Art. 65(1); Art. 81(1) EC)
(ECSC Treaty, Art. 15, first para., and Art. 65(5))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
2 October 2003 (1)
((Appeal – Agreements and concerted practices – European producers of beams))
In Case C-195/99 P, Krupp Hoesch Stahl AG, established in Dortmund (Germany), represented by F. Montag, Rechtsanwalt, with an address for service in Luxembourg,appellant,
APPEAL against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 March 1999 in Case T-147/94 Krupp Hoesch v Commission [1999] ECR II-603, seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other party to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities, represented by J. Currall and W. Wils, acting as Agents, assisted by H.-J. Freund, Rechtsanwalt, with an address for service in Luxembourg,defendant at first instance,THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),,
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing oral argument from the parties at the hearing on 31 January 2002,after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 26 September 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
hereby:
Wathelet |
Edward |
La Pergola |
Jann |
von Bahr |
|
R. Grass |
M. Wathelet |
Registrar |
President of the Fifth Chamber |