Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 61998CO0325

    Order of the Court of 11 May 1999.
    Philippe Anssens v Directeur des services fiscaux du Nord.
    Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunal de grande instance de Lille - France.
    Reference for a preliminary ruling - Inadmissible.
    Case C-325/98.

    European Court Reports 1999 I-02969

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1999:244

    61998O0325

    Order of the Court of 11 May 1999. - Philippe Anssens v Directeur des services fiscaux du Nord. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunal de grande instance de Lille - France. - Reference for a preliminary ruling - Inadmissible. - Case C-325/98.

    European Court reports 1999 Page I-02969


    Summary

    Keywords


    Preliminary rulings - Admissibility of questions - Questions not providing sufficient explanation of the factual and legislative context - Questions submitted in a context which precludes a useful reply

    (EC Treaty, Art. 177 (now Art. 234 EC); EC Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 20)

    Summary


    In order to reach an interpretation of Community law which will be of use to the national court, it is essential that the national court define the factual and legislative context of the questions it is asking or, at the very least, explain the factual circumstances on which those questions are based.

    In this respect, the information provided and the questions raised in orders for reference must not only be such as to enable the Court usefully to reply but also such as to give the Governments of the Member States and other interested parties the opportunity to submit observations pursuant to Article 20 of the EC Statute of the Court. It is the Court's duty to ensure that the opportunity to submit observations is safeguarded, bearing in mind that, by virtue of the abovementioned provision, only the orders for reference are notified to the interested parties.

    Top