This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 02002D0253-20090501
Commission Decision of 19 March 2002 laying down case definitions for reporting communicable diseases to the Community network under Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document number C(2002) 1043) (2002/253/EC)
Consolidated text: Commission Decision of 19 March 2002 laying down case definitions for reporting communicable diseases to the Community network under Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document number C(2002) 1043) (2002/253/EC)
Commission Decision of 19 March 2002 laying down case definitions for reporting communicable diseases to the Community network under Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document number C(2002) 1043) (2002/253/EC)
2002D0253 — EN — 01.05.2009 — 003.001
This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
|
COMMISSION DECISION of 19 March 2002 laying down case definitions for reporting communicable diseases to the Community network under Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document number C(2002) 1043) (OJ L 086, 3.4.2002, p.44) |
Amended by:
|
|
|
Official Journal |
||
|
No |
page |
date |
||
|
L 184 |
35 |
23.7.2003 |
||
|
L 159 |
46 |
18.6.2008 |
||
|
L 110 |
58 |
1.5.2009 |
||
COMMISSION DECISION
of 19 March 2002
laying down case definitions for reporting communicable diseases to the Community network under Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
(notified under document number C(2002) 1043)
(2002/253/EC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Decision No 2119/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 1998 setting up a network for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases in the Community ( 1 ), and in particular Article 3(c) thereof,
Whereas:|
(1) |
Member States should communicate information on the epidemiological development and emergence of public health threats due to communicable diseases using the Community network in a way which allows comparisons to be made for preventive and control action to be taken at Community and national level. |
|
(2) |
For comparability of such information, the setting up of common case definitions is a prerequisite even where disease-specific surveillance networks have not yet been put in place. As soon as this Decision comes into effect these case definitions should be used for reporting to the Community network, and should comply with regulations on individual data protection. |
|
(3) |
The case definitions which allow comparable reporting should comprise a tiered system allowing Member States' structures and/or authorities flexibility in communicating information on diseases and special health issues. In particular, these case definitions will facilitate reporting on diseases listed in Commission Decision 2000/96/EC ( 2 ). |
|
(4) |
Case definitions should be constructed to enable all Member States to participate in the reporting to the greatest extent possible, using data from their existing systems. They should allow for different levels of sensitivity and specificity according to the different goals of information collection and they should be easy to amend. |
|
(5) |
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up by Decision No 2119/98/EC, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
For the purposes of submitting data for the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable diseases under the provisions of Decision No 2119/98/EC, and in particular Article 4 thereof, Member States shall apply the case definitions specified in the Annex.
Article 2
This Decision will be adapted to the extent necessary on the basis of the latest scientific data.
Article 3
This Decision shall apply as of 1 January 2003.
Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
ANNEX
EXPLANATION OF THE SECTIONS USED FOR THE DEFINITION AND CLASSIFICATION OF CASES
Clinical criteria
These should include common and relevant signs and symptoms of the disease which either individually or in combination constitutes a clear or indicative clinical picture of the disease. The clinical criteria give the general outline of the disease and do not necessarily indicate all the features needed for individual clinical diagnosis.
Laboratory criteria
Laboratory criteria should be a list of laboratory methods that are used to confirm a case. Usually only one of the listed tests will be enough to confirm the case. If a combination of methods is needed to meet the laboratory confirmation, this is specified. The type of specimen to be collected for the laboratory tests is only specified when only certain specimen types are considered relevant for the confirmation of a diagnosis. For some agreed exceptions, laboratory criteria for a probable case are included. This is a list of laboratory methods which can be used to support the diagnosis of a case but which are not confirmatory.
Epidemiological criteria and epidemiological link
Epidemiological criteria are deemed to have been met when an epidemiological link can be established.
Epidemiological link, during the incubation period, is defined as one of the six following:
— human to human transmission: Any person who has had contact with a laboratory confirmed human case in such a way as to have had the opportunity to acquire the infection,
— animal to human transmission: Any person who has had contact with an animal with a laboratory confirmed infection/colonisation in such a way as to have had the opportunity to acquire the infection,
— exposure to a common source: Any person who has been exposed to the same common source or vehicle of infection, as a confirmed human case,
— exposure to contaminated food/drinking water: Any person who has consumed food or drinking water with a laboratory confirmed contamination or a person who has consumed potentially contaminated products from an animal with a laboratory confirmed infection/colonisation,
— environmental exposure: Any person who has bathed in water or has had contact with a contaminated environmental source that has been laboratory confirmed,
— laboratory exposure: Any person working in a laboratory where there is a potential for exposure.
A person may be considered epidemiologically linked to a confirmed case if at least one case in the chain of transmission is laboratory confirmed. In case of an outbreak of faeco-oral or airborne transmitted infections, the chain of transmission does not necessarily need to be established to consider a case epidemiologically linked.
Transmission may occur by one or more of the following routes:
— airborne, by projection of aerosol from an infected person onto the mucous membranes while coughing, spitting, singing or talking, or when microbial aerosols dispersed into the atmosphere are inhaled by others,
— contact, direct contact with an infected person (faecal-oral, respiratory droplets, skin or sexual exposure) or animal (e.g. biting, touching) or indirect contact to infected materials or objects (infected fomites, body fluids, blood),
— vertical, from mother to child, often in utero, or as a result of the incidental exchange of body fluids usually during the perinatal period,
— vector transmission, indirect transmission by infected mosquitoes, mites, flies and other insects which transmit disease to humans through their bites,
— food or water, consumption of potentially contaminated food or drinking water.
Case classification
Cases will be classified as ‘possible’, ‘probable’ and ‘confirmed’. The incubation periods for diseases are given in the additional information to facilitate the assessment of the epidemiological link.
Possible case
Defined as a case that is classified as possible for reporting purposes. It is usually a case with the clinical criteria as described in the case definition without epidemiological or laboratory evidence of the disease in question. The definition of a possible case has high sensitivity and low specificity. It allows for detection of most cases but some false positives cases will be included into this category.
Probable case
Defined as a case that is classified as probable for reporting purposes. It is usually a case with clinical criteria and an epidemiological link as described in the case definition. Laboratory tests for probable cases are specified only for some diseases.
Confirmed case
Defined as a case that is classified as confirmed for reporting purposes. Confirmed cases should be laboratory confirmed and may fulfil the clinical criteria or not as described in the case definition. The definition of a confirmed case is highly specific and less sensitive; therefore most of the collected cases will be true cases although some will be missed.
The clinical criteria of some diseases do not allude to the fact that many acute cases are asymptomatic, (e.g. hepatitis A, B and C, campylobacter, salmonellosis) although these cases may still be important from a public health perspective on national level.
Confirmed cases will fall in one of the three subcategories listed below. These subcategories will be created during the analysis of data using the variables collected with the case information.
Laboratory-confirmed case with clinical criteria
The case meets the laboratory criteria for case confirmation and the clinical criteria included in the case definition.
Laboratory-confirmed case with unknown clinical criteria
The case meets the laboratory criteria for case confirmation but there is no information available regarding the clinical criteria (e.g. only laboratory report).
Laboratory-confirmed case without clinical criteria
The case meets the laboratory criteria for case confirmation but doesn't meet the clinical criteria in the case definition or is asymptomatic.
ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME (AIDS) AND HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS (HIV) INFECTION
Clinical criteria (AIDS)
Any person who has any of the clinical conditions as defined in the European AIDS case definition for:
— Adults and adolescents = 13 years ( 3 )
— Children < 13 years of age ( 4 )
Laboratory criteria (HIV)
— Adults, adolescents and children aged = 18 months
— At least one of the following three:
—— Positive result of a HIV screening antibody test or a combined screening test (HIV antibody and HIV p24 antigen) confirmed by a more specific antibody test (e.g. Western blot)
— Positive result of 2 EIA antibody test confirmed by a positive result of a further EIA test
— Positive results on two separate specimens from at least one of the following three:
—— Detection of HIV nucleic acid (HIV-RNA, HIV-DNA)
— Demonstration of HIV by HIV p24 antigen test, including neutralisation assay
— Isolation of HIV
— Children aged < 18 months
— Positive results on two separate specimens (excluding cord blood) from at least one of the following three:
—— Isolation of HIV
— Detection of HIV nucleic acid (HIV-RNA, HIV-DNA)
— Demonstration of HIV by HIV p24 antigen test, including neutralisation assay in a child =1 month of age
Epidemiological criteria
NA
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
NA
C. Confirmed case
— HIV infection
— Any person meeting the laboratory criteria for HIV infection
— AIDS
— Any person meeting the clinical criteria for AIDS and the laboratory criteria for HIV infection
ANTHRAX
(Bacillus anthracis)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following clinical forms:
Cutaneous anthrax
At least one the following two:
— Papular or vesicular lesion
— Depressed black eschar with surrounding oedema
Gastrointestinal anthrax
— Fever or feverishness
AND at least one of the following two:
— Severe abdominal pain
— Diarrhoea
Inhalational anthrax
— Fever or feverishness
AND at least one of the following two:
— Acute respiratory distress
— Radiological evidence of mediastinal widening
Meningeal/meningoencephalitic anthrax
— Fever
AND at least one of the following three:
— Convulsions
— Loss of consciousness
— Meningeal signs
Anthrax septicaemia
Laboratory criteria
— Isolation of Bacillus anthracis from a clinical specimen
— Detection of Bacillus anthracis nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
Positive nasal swab without clinical symptoms does not contribute to a confirmed diagnosis of a case.
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following three epidemiological links:
— Animal to human transmission
— Exposure to a common source
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
AVIAN INFLUENZA A/H5 OR A/H5N1 IN HUMANS
Clinical criteria
Any person with one of the following two:
— Fever AND signs and symptoms of acute respiratory infection
— Death from an unexplained acute respiratory illness
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following three:
— Isolation of influenza A/H5N1 from a clinical specimen
— Detection of influenza A/H5 nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— Influenza A/H5 specific antibody response (fourfold or greater rise or single high titre)
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following four:
— Human to human transmission by having been in close contact (within one metre) to a person reported as probable or confirmed case
— Laboratory exposure: where there is a potential exposure to influenza A/H5N1
— Close contact (within one metre) with an animal with confirmed A/H5N1 infection other than poultry or wild birds (e.g. cat or pig)
— Reside in or have visited an area where influenza A/H5N1 is currently suspected or confirmed ( 5 ) AND at least one of the following two:
—— Having been in close contact (within one metre) with sick or dead domestic poultry or wild birds ( 6 ) in the affected area
— Having been in a home or a farm where sick or dead domestic poultry have been reported in the previous month in the affected area
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical and the epidemiological criteria
B. Probable case
Any person with a positive test for influenza A/H5 or A/H5N1 performed by a laboratory which is not a National Reference Laboratory participating in the EU Community Network of Reference Laboratories for human influenza (CNRL)
C. Nationally confirmed case
Any person with a positive test for influenza A/H5 or A/H5N1 performed by a National Reference Laboratory participating in the EU Community Network of Reference Laboratories for human influenza (CNRL)
D. WHO confirmed case
Any person with a laboratory confirmation by a WHO Collaborating Centre for H5
BOTULISM
(Clostridium botulinum)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following clinical forms:
Food-borne and wound botulism
At least one of the following two:
— Bilateral cranial nerve impairment (e.g. diplopia, blurred vision, dysphagia, bulbar weakness)
— Peripheral symmetric paralysis
Infant botulism
Any infant with at least one of the following six:
— Constipation
— Lethargy
— Poor feeding
— Ptosis
— Dysphagia
— General muscle weakness
The type of botulism usually encountered in infants (< 12 months of age) can affect children also over 12 months of age and occasionally adults, with altered gastrointestinal anatomy and microflora.
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following two:
— Isolation of C. botulinum for infant botulism (stool) or wound botulism (wound) (isolation of C. botulinum in stool of adults not relevant for the diagnosis of food-borne botulism)
— Detection of botulinum toxin in a clinical specimen
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following two epidemiological links:
— Exposure to a common source (e.g. food, sharing of needles or other devices)
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
BRUCELLOSIS
(Brucella spp.)
Clinical criteria
Any person with fever
AND at least one of following seven:
— Sweating (profuse, malodorous, specially nocturnal)
— Chills
— Arthralgia
— Weakness
— Depression
— Headache
— Anorexia
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following two:
— Isolation of Brucella spp. from a clinical specimen
— Brucella specific antibody response (Standard Agglutination Test, Complement Fixation, ELISA)
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following four epidemiological links:
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
— Exposure to products from a contaminated animal (milk or milk products)
— Animal to human transmission (contaminated secretions or organs e.g. vaginal discharge, placenta)
— Exposure to a common source
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
CAMPYLOBACTERIOSIS
(Campylobacter spp.)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following three:
— Diarrhoea
— Abdominal pain
— Fever
Laboratory criteria
— Isolation of Campylobacter spp. from stool or blood
Differentiation of Campylobacter spp. should be performed if possible
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following five epidemiological links:
— Animal to human transmission
— Human to human transmission
— Exposure to a common source
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
— Environmental exposure
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
CHLAMYDIAL INFECTION
(Chlamydia trachomatis)
INCLUDING LYMPHOGRANULOMA VENEREUM (LGV)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following clinical forms:
Chlamydial infection non-LGV
At least one of the following six:
— Urethritis
— Epididymitis
— Acute salpingitis
— Acute endometritis
— Cervicitis
— Proctitis
In newborn children at least one of the following two:
— Conjunctivitis
— Pneumonia
LGV
At least one of the following five:
— Urethritis
— Genital ulcer
— Inguinal lymphadenopathy
— Cervicitis
— Proctitis
Laboratory criteria
Chlamydial infection non-LGV
At least one of the following three:
— Isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from a specimen of the ano-genital tract or from the conjunctiva
— Demonstration of Chlamydia trachomatis by DFA test in a clinical specimen
— Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
LGV
At least one of the following two:
— Isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from a specimen of the ano-genital tract or from the conjunctiva
— Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— AND
— Identification of serovar (genovar) L1, L2 or L3
Epidemiological criteria
An epidemiological link by Human to human transmission (sexual contact or vertical transmission)
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the laboratory criteria
CHOLERA
(Vibrio cholerae)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following two:
— Diarrhoea
— Vomiting
Laboratory criteria
— Isolation of Vibrio cholerae from a clinical specimen
— AND
— Demonstration of O1 or O139 antigen in the isolate
— AND
— Demonstration of cholera-enterotoxin or the cholera-enterotoxin gene in the isolate
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following four epidemiological links:
— Exposure to a common source
— Human to human transmission
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
— Environmental exposure
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
VARIANT CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE (VCJD)
Preconditions
— Any person with a progressive neuropsychiatric disorder with a duration of illness of at least six months
— Routine investigations do not suggest an alternative diagnosis
— No history of exposure to human pituitary hormones or human dura mater graft
— No evidence of a genetic form of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least four of the following five:
— Early psychiatric symptoms ( 7 )
— Persistent painful sensory symptoms ( 8 )
— Ataxia
— Myoclonus or chorea or dystonia
— Dementia
Diagnostic criteria
Diagnostic criteria for case confirmation:
— Neuropathological confirmation: spongiform change and extensive prion protein deposition with florid plaques throughout the cerebrum and cerebellum
Diagnostic criteria for a probable or a possible case:
— EEG does not show the typical appearance ( 9 ) of sporadic CJD (9) in the early stages of the illness
— Bilateral pulvinar high signal on MRI brain scan
— A positive tonsil biopsy ( 10 )
Epidemiological criteria
An epidemiological link by human to human transmission (e.g. blood transfusion)
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person fulfilling the preconditions
AND
— meeting the clinical criteria
— AND
— a negative EEG for sporadic CJD (10)
B. Probable case
Any person fulfilling the preconditions
AND
— meeting the clinical criteria
— AND
— a negative EEG for sporadic CJD (10)
— AND
— a positive MRI brain scan
— OR
Any person fulfilling the preconditions
AND
— a positive tonsil biopsy
C. Confirmed case
Any person fulfilling the preconditions
AND
— meeting the diagnostic criteria for case confirmation
CRYPTOSPORIDIOSIS
(Cryptosporidium spp)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following two:
— Diarrhoea
— Abdominal pain
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following four:
— Demonstration of Cryptosporidium oocysts in stool
— Demonstration of Cryptosporidium in intestinal fluid or small-bowel biopsy specimens
— Detection of Cryptosporidium nucleic acid in stool
— Detection of Cryptosporidium antigen in stool
Epidemiological criteria
One of the following five epidemiological links:
— Human to human transmission
— Exposure to a common source
— Animal to human transmission
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
— Environmental exposure
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
DIPHTHERIA
(Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following clinical forms:
Respiratory diphtheria:
An upper respiratory tract illness with fever AND one of the following two:
— Croup
— OR
— an adherent membrane in at least one of the following three locations:
—— Tonsil
— Pharynx
— Nose
Nasal diphtheria:
— Uni- or bilateral nasal discharge initially clear and becoming bloody
Cutaneous diphtheria:
— Skin lesion
Diphtheria of other sites:
— Lesion of conjunctiva or mucous membranes
Laboratory criteria
— Isolation of toxin-producing C. diphtheriae or C. ulcerans from a clinical specimen
Epidemiological criteria
An epidemiological link by human to human transmission
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria for respiratory diphtheria
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria for diphtheria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
ECHINOCOCCOSIS
(Echinococcus spp)
Clinical criteria
Not relevant for surveillance purposes
Diagnostic criteria
At least one of the following five:
— Histopathology or parasitology compatible with Echinococcus multilocularis or granulosus (e.g. direct isvisualisation of the protoscolex in cyst fluid)
— Detection of Echinoccocus granulosus pathognomonic macroscopic morphology of cyst(s) in surgical specimens
— Typical organ lesions detected by imaging techniques (e.g.: computerised tomography, sonography, MRI) AND confirmed by a serological test
— Echinococcus spp. specific serum antibodies by high-sensitivity serological test AND confirmed by a high specificity serological test
— Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis or granulosus nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
Epidemiological criteria
NA
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
NA
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the diagnostic criteria
SHIGA/VERO TOXIN PRODUCING ESCHERICHIA COLI INFECTION (STEC/VTEC)
Clinical criteria
STEC/VTEC diarrhoea
Any person with at least one of the following two:
— Diarrhoea
— Abdominal pain
HUS
Any person with acute renal failure and at least one of the following two:
— Microangiopatic haemolytic anaemia
— Thrombocytopenia
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following three:
— Isolation of Shigatoxin/Verotoxin (STEC/VTEC) producing E. coli
— Detection of stx1 or stx2 gene(s) nucleic acid
— Detection of free shigatoxins.
Only for HUS the following can be used as laboratory criterion to confirm STEC/VTEC:
— E. coli serogroups specific antibody response
Isolation and additional ischaracterisation by serotype, phage type, eae genes, and subtypes of stx1/stx2 should be performed if possible
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following five epidemiological links:
— Human to human transmission
— Exposure to a common source
— Animal to human transmission
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
— Environmental exposure
Case classification
A. Possible case of STEC-associated HUS
Any person meeting the clinical criteria for HUS
B. Probable case of STEC/VTEC
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link or a laboratory confirmed case without clinical criteria
C. Confirmed case of STEC/VTEC
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
GIARDIASIS
(Giardia lamblia)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following four:
— Diarrhoea
— Abdominal pain
— Bloating
— Signs of malabsorption (e.g. steatorrhoea, weight loss)
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following two:
— Demonstration of Giardia lamblia cysts or trophozoites in stool, duodenal fluid or small-bowel biopsy
— Demonstration of Giardia lamblia antigen in stool
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following four epidemiological links:
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
— Human to human transmission
— Exposure to a common source
— Environmental exposure
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
GONORRHOEA
(Neisseria gonorrhoeae)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following eight:
— Urethritis
— Acute salpingitis
— Pelvic inflammatory disease
— Cervicitis
— Epididymitis
— Proctitis
— Pharyngitis
— Arthritis
OR
Any newborn child with conjunctivitis
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following four:
— Isolation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from a clinical specimen
— Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— Demonstration of Neisseria gonorrhoeae by a non amplified nucleic acid probe test in a clinical specimen
— Microscopic detection of intracellular gram negative diploccocci in an urethral male specimen
Epidemiological criteria
An epidemiological link by human to human transmission (sexual contact or vertical transmission)
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the laboratory criteria
HAEMOPHILUS MENINGITIS, INVASIVE DISEASE
(Haemophilus influenzae)
Clinical criteria
Not relevant for surveillance purposes
Laboratory criteria
Laboratory criteria for case definition
At least one of the following two:
— Isolation of Haemophilus influenzae from a normally sterile site
— Detection of Haemophilus influenzae nucleic acid from a normally sterile site
Typing of the isolates should be performed, if possible
Epidemiological link
NA
Case Classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
NA
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the laboratory criteria for case confirmation
HEPATITIS A
(Hepatitis A Virus)
Clinical criteria
Any person with a discrete onset of symptoms (e.g. fatigue, abdominal pain, loss of appetite, intermittent nausea and vomiting)
AND
At least one of the following three:
— Fever
— Jaundice
— Elevated serum aminotransferase levels
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following three:
— Detection of hepatitis A virus nucleic acid in serum or stool
— Hepatitis A virus specific antibody response
— Detection of hepatitis A virus antigen in stool
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following four:
— Human to human transmission
— Exposure to a common source
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
— Environmental exposure
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
HEPATITIS B, ACUTE
(Hepatitis B virus)
Clinical criteria
Any person with a discrete onset of symptoms (e.g. fatigue, abdominal pain, loss of appetite, intermittent nausea and vomiting)
AND
At least one of the following three:
— Fever
— Jaundice
— Elevated serum aminotransferase levels
Laboratory criteria
Hepatitis B virus core IgM antigen specific antibody response
Laboratory results need to be interpreted according to the vaccination status
Epidemiological criteria
An epidemiological link by human to human transmission (e.g. sexual contact, vertical transmission or blood transmission)
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
HEPATITIS C
(Hepatitis C virus)
Clinical criteria
Not relevant for surveillance purposes
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following two:
— Detection of hepatitis C virus nucleic acid in serum
— Hepatitis C virus specific antibody response confirmed by a different antibody test
Epidemiological criteria
NA
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
NA
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the laboratory criteria
INFLUENZA
(influenza virus)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following clinical forms:
Influenza-like illness (ILI)
— Sudden onset of symptoms
— AND
— at least one of the following four systemic symptoms:
—— Fever or feverishness
— Malaise
— Headache
— Myalgia
— AND
— at least one of the following three respiratory symptoms:
—— Cough
— Sore throat
— Shortness of breath
Acute respiratory infection (ARI)
— Sudden onset of symptoms
— AND
— At least one of the following four respiratory symptoms:
—— Cough
— Sore throat
— Shortness of breath
— Coryza
— AND
— A clinician's judgement that the illness is due to an infection
Laboratory criteria
At least one the following four:
— Isolation of influenza virus from a clinical specimen
— Detection of influenza virus nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— Identification of influenza virus antigen by DFA test in a clinical specimen
— Influenza specific antibody response
Sub typing of the influenza isolate should be performed, if possible
Epidemiological criteria
An epidemiological link by human to human transmission
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria (ILI or ARI)
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria (ILI or ARI) and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical (ILI or ARI) and the laboratory criteria
LEGIONNAIRES' DISEASE
(Legionella spp.)
Clinical criteria
Any person with pneumonia
Laboratory criteria
— Laboratory criteria for case confirmation
— At least one of the following three:
—— Isolation of Legionella spp. from respiratory secretions or any normally sterile site
— Detection of Legionella pneumophila antigen in urine
— Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 specific antibody response
— Laboratory criteria for a probable case
— At least one of the following four:
—— Detection of Legionella pneumophila antigen in respiratory secretions or lung tissue e.g. by DFA staining using monoclonal-antibody derived reagents
— Detection of Legionella spp. nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— Legionella pneumophila non-serogroup 1 or other Legionella spp. specific antibody response
— L. pneumophila serogroup 1, other serogroups or other Legionella species: single high titre in specific serum antibody
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following two epidemiological links:
— Environmental exposure
— Exposure to the same common source
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria AND at least one positive laboratory test for a probable case OR an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria for case confirmation
LEPTOSPIROSIS
(Leptospira interrogans)
Clinical criteria
Any person with
— Fever
OR
At least two of the following eleven:
— Chills
— Headache
— Myalgia
— Conjunctival suffusion
— Haemorrhages into skin and mucous membranes
— Rash
— Jaundice
— Myocarditis
— Meningitis
— Renal impairment
— Respiratory symptoms such as haemoptysis
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following four:
— Isolation of Leptospira interrogans from a clinical specimen
— Detection of Leptospira interrogans nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— Demonstration of Leptospira interrogans by immunofluorescence in a clinical specimen
— Leptospira interrogans specific antibody response
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following three epidemiological links:
— Animal to human transmission
— Environmental exposure
— Exposure to a common source
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
LISTERIOSIS
(Listeria monocytogenes)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following three:
— Listeriosis of newborns defined as
— Stillbirth
— OR
— At least one of the following five in the first month of life:
—— Granulomatosis infantiseptica
— Meningitis or meningoencephalitis
— Septicaemia
— Dyspnoea
— Lesions on skin, mucosal membranes or conjunctivae
— Listeriosis in pregnancy defined as at least one of the following three:
—— Abortion, miscarriage, stillbirth or premature birth
— Fever
— Influenza-like symptoms
— Other form of listeriosis defined as at least one of the following four:
—— Fever
— Meningitis or meningoencephalitis
— Septicaemia
— isLocalised infections such as arthritis, endocarditis, and abscesses
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following two:
— Isolation of Listeria monocytogenes from a normally sterile site
— Isolation of Listeria monocytogenes from a normally non-sterile site in a foetus, stillborn, newborn or the mother at or within 24 hours of birth
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following three epidemiological links:
— Exposure to a common source
— Human to human transmission (vertical transmission)
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
Additional information
Incubation period 3-70 days, most often 21 days
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the laboratory criteria
OR
Any mother with a laboratory confirmed listeriosis infection in her foetus, stillborn or newborn
MALARIA
(Plasmodium spp.)
Clinical criteria
Any person with fever OR a history of fever
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following three:
— Demonstration of malaria parasites by light microscopy in blood films
— Detection of Plasmodium nucleic acid in blood
— Detection of Plasmodium antigen
Differentiation of Plasmodium spp. should be performed if possible
Epidemiological criteria
NA
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
NA
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
MEASLES
(Measles virus)
Clinical criteria
Any person with fever
AND
— Maculo-papular rash
AND at least one of the following three:
— Cough
— Coryza
— Conjunctivitis
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following four:
— Isolation of measles virus from a clinical specimen
— Detection of measles virus nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— Measles virus specific antibody response characteristic for acute infection in serum or saliva
— Detection of measles virus antigen by DFA in a clinical specimen using measles specific monoclonal antibodies
Laboratory results need to be interpreted according to the vaccination status. If recently vaccinated, investigate for wild virus
Epidemiological criteria
An epidemiological link by human to human transmission
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person not recently vaccinated and meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
MENINGOCCOCAL DISEASE, INVASIVE
(Neisseria meningitidis)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following five:
— Fever
— Meningeal signs
— Petechial rash
— Septic shock
— Septic arthritis
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following four:
— Isolation of Neisseria meningitidis from a normally sterile site, including purpuric skin lesions
— Detection of Neisseria meningitidis nucleic acid from a normally sterile site, including purpuric skin lesions
— Detection of Neisseria meningitidis antigen in CSF
— Detection of gram negative stained diplococcus in CSF
Epidemiological criteria
An epidemiological link by human to human transmission
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the laboratory criteria
MUMPS
(Mumps virus)
Clinical criteria
Any person with
— Fever
AND
At least two of the following three:
— Sudden onset of tender swelling of the parotid or other salivary glands
— Orchitis
— Meningitis
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following three:
— Isolation of mumps virus from a clinical specimen
— Detection of mumps virus nucleic acid
— Mumps virus specific antibody response characteristic for acute infection in serum or saliva
Laboratory results need to be interpreted according to the vaccination status
Epidemiological criteria
An epidemiological link by human to human transmission
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person not recently vaccinated and meeting the laboratory criteria
In case of recent vaccination: any person with detection of wild-type mumps virus strain
PERTUSSIS
(Bordetella pertussis)
Clinical criteria
Any person with a cough lasting at least two weeks
AND
at least one of the following three:
— Paroxysms of coughing
— Inspiratory ‘whooping’
— Post-tussive vomiting
OR
Any person diagnosed as pertussis by a physician
OR
Apnoeic episodes in infants
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following three:
— Isolation of Bordetella pertussis from a clinical specimen
— Detection of Bordetella pertussis nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— Bordetella pertussis specific antibody response
Epidemiological criteria
An epidemiological link by human to human transmission
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
PLAGUE
(Yersinia pestis)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following clinical forms:
Bubonic plague:
— Fever
— AND
— Sudden onset of painful lymphadenitis
Septicaemic plague:
— Fever
Pneumonic plague:
— Fever
— AND
At least one of the following three:
— Cough
— Chest pain
— Haemoptysis
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following three:
— Isolation of Yersinia pestis from a clinical specimen
— Detection of Yersinia pestis nucleic acid from a clinical specimen (F1 antigen)
— Yersinia pestis anti-F1 antigen specific antibody response
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following four epidemiological links:
— Human to human transmission
— Animal to human transmission
— Laboratory exposure (where there is a potential exposure to plague)
— Exposure to a common source
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the laboratory criteria
PNEUMOCOCCAL INVASIVE DISEASE(S)
(Streptococcus pneumoniae)
Clinical criteria
Not relevant for surveillance purposes
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following three:
— Isolation of S. pneumoniae from a normally sterile site
— Detection of S. pneumoniae nucleic acid from a normally sterile site
— Detection of S. pneumoniae antigen from a normally sterile site
Epidemiological criteria
NA
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
NA
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the laboratory criteria
POLIOMYELITIS
(Polio virus)
Clinical criteria
Any person < 15 years of age with acute flaccid paralysis (AFP)
OR
Any person in whom polio is suspected by a physician
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following three:
— Isolation of a polio virus and intratypic differentiation — Wild polio virus (WPV)
— Vaccine derived poliovirus (VDPV) (for the VDPV at least 85 % similarity with vaccine virus in the nucleotide sequences in the VP1 section)
— Sabin-like poliovirus: intratypic differentiation performed by a WHO-accredited polio laboratory (for the VDPV a >1 % up to 15 % VP1 sequence difference compared with vaccine virus of the same serotype)
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following two epidemiological links:
— Human to human transmission
— An history of travel to a polio-endemic area or an area with suspected or confirmed circulation of poliovirus
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
Q FEVER
(Coxiella burnetii)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following three:
— Fever
— Pneumonia
— Hepatitis
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following three:
— Isolation of Coxiella burnetii from a clinical specimen
— Detection of Coxiella burnetii nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— Coxiella burnetii specific antibody response (IgG or IgM phase II)
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following two epidemiological links:
— Exposure to a common source
— Animal to human transmission
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
RABIES
(Lyssa virus)
Clinical criteria
Any person with an acute encephalomyelitis
AND
At least two of the following seven:
— Sensory changes referred to the site of a preceding animal bite
— Paresis or paralysis
— Spasms of swallowing muscles
— Hydrophobia
— Delirium
— Convulsions
— Anxiety
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following four:
— Isolation of Lyssa virus from a clinical specimen
— Detection of Lyssa virus nucleic acid in a clinical specimen (e.g. saliva or brain tissue)
— Detection of viral antigens by a DFA in a clinical specimen
— Lyssa virus specific antibody response by virus isneutralisation assay in serum or CSF
Laboratory results need to be interpreted according to the vaccination or immunisation status
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following three epidemiological links:
— Animal to human transmission (animal with suspected or confirmed infection)
— Exposure to a common source (same animal)
— Human to human transmission (e.g. transplantation of organs)
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
RUBELLA
(Rubella virus)
Clinical criteria
Any person with sudden onset of generalised maculo-papular rash
AND
At least one of the following five:
— Cervical adenopathy
— Sub-occipital adenopathy
— Post-auricular adenopathy
— Arthralgia
— Arthritis
Laboratory criteria
— Laboratory criteria for case confirmation
— At least one of the following three:
— Isolation of rubella virus from a clinical specimen
— Detection of rubella virus nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— Rubella virus specific antibody response (IgG) in serum or saliva
— Laboratory criteria for probable case
— Rubella virus specific antibody response (IgM) ( 11 )
Laboratory results need to be interpreted according to the vaccination status
Epidemiological criteria
An epidemiological link by human to human transmission
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with at least one of the following two:
— An epidemiological link
— Meeting the laboratory criteria for a probable case
C. Confirmed case
Any person not recently vaccinated and meeting the laboratory criteria for case confirmation
In case of recent vaccination, a person with detection of wild-type rubella virus strain
RUBELLA, CONGENITAL
(Including congenital rubella syndrome)
Clinical criteria
Congenital rubella infection (CRI)
No clinical criteria can be defined for CRI
Congenital rubella syndrome (CRS)
Any infant < 1 year of age or any stillborn with:
— At least two of the conditions listed in (A)
— OR
— One in category (A) and one in category (B)
(A)
— Cataract(s)
— Congenital glaucoma
— Congenital heart disease
— Loss of hearing
— Pigmentary retinopathy
(B)
— Purpura
— Splenomegaly
— Microcephaly
— Developmental delay
— Meningo-encephalitis
— Radiolucent bone disease
— Jaundice that begins within 24 hours after birth
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following four:
— Isolation of rubella virus from a clinical specimen
— Detection of Rubella virus nucleic acid
— Rubella virus specific antibody response (IgM)
— Persistence of rubella IgG between 6 and 12 months of age (at least two samples with similar concentration of rubella IgG)
Laboratory results need to be interpreted according to the vaccination status
Epidemiological criteria
Any infant or any stillborn born to a woman with a laboratory confirmed rubella infection during pregnancy by human to human transmission vertical transmission)
Case classification Congenital Rubella
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any stillborn or infant either not tested OR with negative laboratory results with at least one of the following two:
— An epidemiological link AND at least one category ‘A’ CRS clinical criteria
— Meeting the clinical criteria for CRS
C. Confirmed case
Any stillborn meeting the laboratory criteria
OR
Any infant meeting the laboratory criteria AND at least one of the following two:
— An epidemiological link
— At least one category ‘A’ CRS clinical criteria
An infant with positive laboratory criteria only without a history of rubella in the mother during the pregnancy and without ‘A’ clinical criteria will therefore be reported as rubella case.
SALMONELLOSIS
(Salmonella spp. other than S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following four:
— Diarrhoea
— Fever
— Abdominal pain
— Vomiting
Laboratory criteria
— Isolation of Salmonella (other than S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi) from stool or blood
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following five epidemiological links:
— Human to human transmission
— Exposure to a common source
— Animal to human transmission
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
— Environmental exposure
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME — SARS
(SARS-coronavirus, SARS-CoV)
Clinical criteria
Any person with fever or a history of fever
AND
At least one of the following three:
— Cough
— Difficulty in breathing
— Shortness of breath
AND
At least one of the following four:
— Radiographic evidence of pneumonia
— Radiographic evidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome
— Autopsy findings of pneumonia
— Autopsy findings of acute respiratory distress syndrome
AND
No alternative diagnosis which can fully explain the illness
Laboratory criteria
— Laboratory criteria for case confirmation
— At least one of the following three:
—— Isolation of virus in cell culture from any clinical specimen and identification of SARS-CoV using method such as RT-PCR
— Detection SARS-CoV nucleic acid in at least one of the following three:
—— At least two different clinical specimens (e.g. nasopharyngeal swab and stool)
— The same clinical specimen collected on two or more occasions during the course of the illness (e.g. sequential nasopharyngeal aspirates)
— Two different assays or repeat RT-PCR using a new RNA extract from the original clinical sample on each occasion of testing
— SARS-CoV specific antibody response by one of the following two:
—— Seroconversion by ELISA or IFA in acute and convalescent phase serum tested in parallel
— Fourfold or greater rise in antibody titre between acute and convalescent phase sera tested in parallel
— Laboratory criteria for a probable case
— At least one of the following two:
—— A single positive antibody test for SARS-CoV
— A positive PCR result for SARS-CoV on a single clinical specimen and assay
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following three:
— Any person with at least one of the following three:
—— Employed in an occupation associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV exposure (e.g. staff in a laboratory working with live SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-like viruses or storing clinical specimens infected with SARS-CoV; persons with exposure to wildlife or other animals considered a reservoir of SARS-CoV, their excretions or secretions, etc.)
— Close contact ( 12 ) of one or more persons with confirmed SARS or under investigation for SARS
— History of travel to, or residence in, an area experiencing an outbreak of SARS
— Two or more health-care workers ( 13 ) with clinical evidence of SARS in the same health-care unit and with onset of illness in the same 10-day period
— Three or more persons (health-care workers and/or patients and/or visitors) with clinical evidence of SARS with onset of illness in the same 10-day period and epidemiologically linked to a healthcare facility
Case classification for the inter-epidemic period
Also applies during an outbreak in a non-affected country or area
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria AND with an epidemiological link AND meeting the laboratory criteria for a probable case
C. Nationally confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria for case confirmation where the testing has been performed at a national reference laboratory
D. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria for case confirmation where the testing has been performed at a WHO SARS verification and reference laboratory
Case classification during an outbreak
Applies during an outbreak in a country/area where at least one person has been laboratory confirmed by a WHO SARS verification and reference laboratory
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link to a nationally confirmed or a confirmed case
C. Nationally confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria for case confirmation where the testing has been performed at a national reference laboratory
D. Confirmed case
One of the following three:
— Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria for case confirmation where the testing has been performed at a WHO SARS verification and reference laboratory
— Any nationally confirmed case with an epidemiological link to a chain of transmission where at least one case has been independently verified by a WHO SARS reference and verification laboratory
— Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with laboratory criteria for probable case with an epidemiological link to a chain of transmission where at least one case has been independently verified by a WHO SARS reference and verification laboratory
SHIGELLOSIS
(Shigella spp.)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following four:
— Diarrhoea
— Fever
— Vomiting
— Abdominal pain
Laboratory criteria
— Isolation of Shigella spp. from a clinical specimen
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following five epidemiological links:
— Human to human transmission
— Exposure to a common source
— Animal to human transmission
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
— Environmental exposure
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
SMALLPOX
(Variola virus)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following two:
— Fever
AND
Vesicles or firm pustules rash at the same stage of development with a centrifugal distribution
— Atypical presentations defined as at least one of the following four:
—— Haemorrhagic lesions
— Flat velvety lesions not progressing to vesicles
— Variola sine eruptione
— Milder type
Laboratory criteria
— Laboratory criteria for case confirmation
— At least one of the following two laboratory tests:
—— Isolation of smallpox (variola virus) from a clinical specimen followed by sequencing (designated P4 laboratories only)
— Detection of Variola virus nucleic acid in a clinical specimen followed by sequencing
Laboratory results need to be interpreted according to the vaccination status
— Laboratory criteria for a probable case
— Identification of orthopox virus particles by EM
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following two epidemiological links:
— Human to human transmission
— Laboratory exposure (where there is a potential exposure to Variola virus)
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with at least one of the following two:
— An epidemiological link to a confirmed human case by human to human transmission
— Meeting the laboratory criteria for a probable case
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the laboratory criteria for case confirmation
During an outbreak: any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
SYPHILIS
(Treponema pallidum)
Clinical criteria
— Primary syphilis
— Any person with one or several (usually painless) chancres in the genital, perineal, anal area or mouth or pharyngeal mucosa or elsewhere extragenitally
— Secondary syphilis
— Any person with at least one of the following three:
—— Diffuse maculo-papular rash often involving palms and soles
— Generalised lymphadenopathy
— Condyloma lata
— Enanthema
— Allopetia diffusa
— Early latent syphilis (< 1 year)
— A history of symptoms compatible with those of the earlier stages of syphilis within the previous 12 months
— Late latent syphilis (> 1 year)
— Any person meeting laboratory criteria (specific serological tests)
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following four laboratory tests:
— Demonstration of Treponema pallidum in lesion exudates or tissues by dark-field microscopic examination
— Demonstration of Treponema pallidum in lesion exudates or tissues by DFA test
— Demonstration of Treponema in lesion exudates or tissues by PCR
— Detection of Treponema pallidum antibodies by screening test (TPHA, TPPA or EIA) AND additionally detection of Tp-IgM antibodies (by IgM-ELISA, IgM immunoblot or 19S-IgM-FTA-abs) — confirmed by a second IgM assay
Epidemiological criteria
— Primary/secondary syphilis
— An epidemiological link by human to human (sexual contact)
— Early latent syphilis (< 1 year)
— An epidemiological link by human to human (sexual contact) within the 12 previous months
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the laboratory criteria for case confirmation
SYPHILIS, CONGENITAL AND NEONATAL
(Treponema pallidum)
Clinical criteria
Any infant < 2 years of age with at least one of the following 10:
— Hepatospenomegaly
— Mucocutaneous lesions
— Condyloma lata
— Persistent rhinitis
— Jaundice
— Pseudoparalysis (due to periostitis and osteochondritis)
— Central nervous involvement
— Anaemia
— Nephrotic syndrome
— Malnutrition
Laboratory criteria
— Laboratory criteria for case confirmation
— At least one of the following three:
—— Demonstration of Treponema pallidum by dark field microscopy in the umbilical cord, the placenta, a nasal discharge or skin lesion material
— Demonstration of Treponema pallidum by DFA-TP in the umbilical cord, the placenta, a nasal discharge or skin lesion material
— Detection of Treponema pallidum — specific IgM (FTA-abs, EIA)
— AND a reactive non treponemal test (VDRL, RPR) in the child's serum
— Laboratory criteria for a probable case
— At least one of the following three:
—— Reactive VDRL-CSF test result
— Reactive non treponemal and treponemal serologic tests in the mother's serum
— Infant's non treponemal antibody titre is fourfold or greater than the antibody titre in the mother's serum
Epidemiological criteria
Any infant with an epidemiological link by human to human transmission (vertical transmission)
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any infant or child meeting the clinical criteria and with at least one of the following two:
— An epidemiological link
— Meeting the laboratory criteria for a probable case
C. Confirmed case
Any infant meeting the laboratory criteria for case confirmation
TETANUS
(Clostridium tetani)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least two of the following three:
— Painful muscular contractions primarily of the masseter and neck muscles leading to facial spasms known as trismus and ‘risus sardonicus’
— Painful muscular contractions of trunk muscles
— Generalised spasms, frequently position of opisthotonus
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following two:
— Isolation of Clostridium tetani from an infection site
— Detection of tetanus toxin in a serum sample
Epidemiological criteria
NA
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
TOXOPLASMOSIS, CONGENITAL
(Toxoplasma gondii)
Clinical criteria
Not relevant for surveillance purposes
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following four:
— Demonstration of T. gondii in body tissues or fluids
— Detection of T. gondii nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— T. gondii specific antibody response (IgM, IgG, IgA) in a newborn
— Persistently stable IgG T. gondii titres in an infant (<12 months of age)
Epidemiological criteria
NA
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
NA
C. Confirmed case
Any infant meeting the laboratory criteria
TRICHINELLOSIS
(Trichinella spp.)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least three of the following six:
— Fever
— Muscle soreness and pain
— Diarrhoea
— Facial oedema
— Eosinophilia
— Subconjunctival, subungual and retinal haemorrhages
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following two:
— Demonstration of Trichinella larvae in tissue obtained by muscle biopsy
— Trichinella specific antibody response (IFA test, ELISA or Western Blot)
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following two epidemiological links:
— Exposure to contaminated food (meat)
— Exposure to a common source
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and the laboratory criteria
TUBERCULOSIS
(Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex)
Clinical criteria
Any person with the following two:
— Signs, symptoms and/or radiological findings consistent with active tuberculosis in any site
— AND
— A clinician's decision to treat the person with a full course of anti-tuberculosis therapy
OR
A case discovered post-mortem with pathological findings consistent with active tuberculosis that would have indicated anti-tuberculosis antibiotic treatment had the patient been diagnosed before dying
Laboratory criteria
— Laboratory criteria for case confirmation
— At least one of the following two:
—— Isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (excluding Mycobacterium bovis-BCG) from a clinical specimen
— Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex nucleic acid in a clinical specimen AND positive microscopy for acid-fast bacilli or equivalent fluorescent staining bacilli on light microscopy
— Laboratory criteria for a probable case
— At least one of the following three:
—— Microscopy for acid-fast bacilli or equivalent fluorescent staining bacilli on light microscopy
— Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— Histological appearance of granulomata
Epidemiological criteria
NA
Case classification
A. Possible case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and the laboratory criteria for a probable case
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria for case confirmation
TULARAEMIA
(Francisella tularensis)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following clinical forms:
— Ulceroglandular tularaemia
—— Cutaneous ulcer
— AND
— Regional lymphadenopathy
— Glandular tularaemia
—— Enlarged and painful lymph nodes without apparent ulcer
— Oculoglandular tularaemia
—— Conjunctivitis
— AND
— Regional lymphadenopathy
— Oropharyngeal tularaemia
—— Cervical lymphadenopathy
— AND
— at least one of the following three:
—— Stomatitis
— Pharyngitis
— Tonsillitis
— Intestinal tularaemia
— At least one of the following three:
—— Abdominal pain
— Vomiting
— Diarrhoea
— Pneumonic tularaemia
—— Pneumonia
— Typhoidal tularaemia
— At least one of the following two:
—— Fever without early localising signs and symptoms
— Septicaemia
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following three:
— Isolation of Francisella tularensis from a clinical specimen
— Detection of Francisella tularensis nucleic acid in a clinical specimen
— Francisella tularensis specific antibody response
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following three epidemiological links:
— Exposure to a common source
— Animal to human transmission
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
TYPHOID/PARATYPHOID FEVER
(Salmonella Typhi/Paratyphi)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following two:
— Onset of sustained fever
— At least two of the following four:
—— Headache
— Relative bradycardia
— Non productive cough
— Diarrhoea, constipation, malaise or abdominal pain
Paratyphoid fever has the same symptoms as typhoid fever, however usually a milder course.
Laboratory criteria
— Isolation of Salmonella Typhi or Paratyphi from a clinical specimen
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following three epidemiological links:
— Exposure to a common source
— Human to human transmission
— Exposure to contaminated food/drinking water
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
VIRAL HAEMORRHAGIC FEVERS
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following two:
— Fever
— Haemorrhagic manifestations in various forms that may lead to multi-organ failure
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following two:
— Isolation of specific virus from a clinical specimen
— Detection of specific virus nucleic acid in a clinical specimen and genotyping
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following:
— Travel in the last 21 days to a region where VHF cases are known or believed to have occurred
— Exposure within the last 21 days to a probable or confirmed case of a Viral Hemorrhagic Fever whose onset of illness was within the last six months
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
WEST NILE FEVER
(West Nile virus infection, WNV)
Clinical criteria
Any person with fever
OR
At least one of the following two:
— Encephalitis
— Meningitis
Laboratory criteria
— Laboratory test for case confirmation
— At least one of the following four:
—— Isolation of WNV from blood or CSF
— Detection of WNV nucleic acid in blood or CSF
— WNV specific antibody response (IgM) in CSF
— WNV IgM high titre AND detection of WNV IgG, AND confirmation by neutralisation
— Laboratory test for a probable case
— WNV specific antibody response in serum
— Laboratory results need to be interpreted according to flavivirus vaccination status
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following two epidemiological links:
— Animal to human transmission (residing, having visited or having been exposed to mosquito bites in an area where WNV is endemic in horses or birds)
— Human to human transmission (vertical transmission, blood transfusion, transplants)
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria AND with at least one of the following two:
— an epidemiological link
— a laboratory test for a probable case
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the laboratory criteria for case confirmation
YELLOW FEVER
(Yellow fever virus)
Clinical criteria
Any person with fever
AND
At least one of the following two:
— Jaundice
— Generalised haemorrhage
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following five:
— Isolation of yellow fever virus from a clinical specimen
— Detection of yellow fever virus nucleic acid
— Detection of yellow fever antigen
— Yellow fever specific antibody response
— Demonstration of typical lesions in post mortem liver histopathology
Laboratory results need to be interpreted according to flavivirus vaccination status
Epidemiological criteria
Travel in the last one week to a region where yellow fever cases are known or believed to have occurred
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person not recently vaccinated meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
In case of recent vaccination, a person with detection of wild-type yellow fever virus strain.
YERSINIOSIS
(Yersinia enterocolitica, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis)
Clinical criteria
Any person with at least one of the following five:
— Fever
— Diarrhoea
— Vomiting
— Abdominal pain (pseudoappendicitis)
— Tenesmus
Laboratory criteria
— Isolation of human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica or Yersinia pseudotuberculosis from a clinical specimen
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following four epidemiological links:
— Human to human transmission
— Exposure to a common source
— Animal to human transmission
— Exposure to contaminated food
Case classification
A. Possible case
NA
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical criteria and with an epidemiological link
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the clinical and the laboratory criteria
NOVEL INFLUENZA VIRUS A(H1N1) (THE SO-CALLED SWINE INFLUENZA VIRUS A(H1N1) AND MEXICAN INFLUENZA VIRUS) ( 14 )
Clinical criteria
Any person with one of the following three:
— fever > 38 °C AND signs and symptoms of acute respiratory infection,
— pneumonia (severe respiratory illness),
— death from an unexplained acute respiratory illness.
Laboratory criteria
At least one of the following tests:
— RT-PCR,
— viral culture (requiring BSL 3 facilities),
— four-fold rise in novel influenza virus A(H1N1) specific neutralising antibodies (implies the need for paired sera, from acute phase illness and then at convalescent stage 10-14 days later minimum).
Epidemiological criteria
At least one of the following three in the seven days before disease onset:
— a person who was a close contact to a confirmed case of novel influenza A(H1N1) virus infection while the case was ill,
— a person who has travelled to an area where sustained human-to-human transmission of novel influenza A(H1N1) is documented,
— a person working in a laboratory where samples of the novel influenza A(H1N1) virus are tested.
Case classification
A. Case under investigation
Any person meeting the clinical and epidemiological criteria.
B. Probable case
Any person meeting the clinical AND epidemiological criteria AND with a laboratory result showing positive influenza A infection of an unsubtypable type.
C. Confirmed case
Any person meeting the laboratory criteria for confirmation.
( 1 ) OJ L 268, 3.10.1998, p. 1.
( 2 ) OJ L 28, 3.2.2000, p. 50.
( 3 ) European Centre for the Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS. 1993 revision of the European AIDS surveillance case definition. AIDS Surveillance in Europe, Quarterly Report 1993; No 37: 23-28
( 4 ) European Centre for the Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS. European case definition for AIDS surveillance in children — revision 1995. HIV/AIDS Surveillance in Europe, Quarterly Report 1995; No 48: 46-53
( 5 ) See World isOrganisation for Animal Health — OIE — and European Commission (SANCO) Animal Disease Notification System (ADNS), available at: http://www.oie.int/eng/en_index.htm and http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/diseases/adns/index_en.htm#)
( 6 ) This does not include seemingly well birds that have been killed, for example by hunting.
( 7 ) Depression, anxiety, apathy, withdrawal, delusions.
( 8 ) This includes both frank pain and/or dysaesthesia.
( 9 ) The typical appearance of the EEG in sporadic CJD consists of generalised periodic complexes at approximately one per second. These may occasionally be seen in the late stages of VCJD.
( 10 ) Tonsil biopsy is not recommended routinely nor in cases with EEG appearances typical of sporadic CJD, but may be useful in suspect cases in which the clinical features are compatible with VCJD and MRI does not show pulvinar high signal.
( 11 ) When rubella in pregnancy is suspected, further confirmation of a positive rubella IgM results is required (e.g. a rubella specific IgG avidity test showing a low avidity). In certain situations, such as confirmed rubella outbreaks detection of rubella virus IgM can be considered confirmatory in non-pregnant cases.
( 12 ) A close contact is a person who has cared for, lived with, or having had direct contact with the respiratory secretions, body fluids and/or excretions (e.g. faeces) of cases of SARS.
( 13 ) In this context the term ‘health-care worker’ includes all hospital staff. The definition of the health care unit in which the cluster occurs will depend on the local situation. Unit size may range from an entire health care facility if small, to a single department or ward of a large tertiary hospital.
( 14 ) The name will be changed in line with the definition provided by the World Health Organisation.