(1)

Article 119(1) second subparagraph of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 as amended by Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 1310/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down certain transitional provisions on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), amending Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards resources and their distribution in respect of the year 2014 and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 and Regulations (EU) No 1307/2013, (EU) No 1306/2013 and (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards their application in the year 2014 (5), provides that Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 applies for the financial clearance of the expenditure incurred and payments made for agricultural financial year 2013.

(2)

Pursuant to Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the Commission clears the accounts of the paying agencies referred to in Article 6 of the said Regulation, on the basis of the annual accounts submitted by the Member States, accompanied by the information required for the clearance of accounts and a certificate regarding the integrality, accuracy and veracity of the accounts and the reports established by the certification bodies.

(3)

Pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2006, for the 2013 financial year, account is taken of expenditure incurred by the Member States between 16 October 2012 and 15 October 2013.

(4)

The first subparagraph of Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 lays down that the amounts that are recoverable from, or payable to, each Member State, in accordance with the accounts clearance decision referred to in the first subparagraph of article 10(1) of the said regulation, shall be determined by deducting the monthly payments in respect of the financial year in question, i.e. 2013, from expenditure recognised for that year in accordance with paragraph 1. The Commission shall deduct that amount from or add it to the monthly payment relating to the expenditure effected in the second month following that in which the accounts clearance decision is taken.

(5)

The Commission has checked the information submitted by the Member States and it has communicated to the Member States before 31 March 2014 the results of its verifications, along with the necessary amendments.

(6)

The annual accounts and the accompanying documents presented by certain paying agencies satisfy the Commission for it to decide on the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the annual accounts submitted. Annex I lists the amounts cleared and the amounts to be recovered from or paid to the Member States for which the accounts have been found to be complete, accurate and true.

(7)

The information submitted by certain other paying agencies requires additional inquiries and their accounts cannot be cleared in this decision. Annex II lists the paying agencies concerned.

(8)

Under Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2006, any overrun of deadlines during August, September and October is to be taken into account in the annual clearance of accounts decision. Some of the expenditure declared by certain Member States during these months in the year 2013 was effected after the applicable deadlines. This decision should accordingly fix the appropriate reductions to the amounts to clear.

(9)

The Commission, in accordance with Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 and Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2006, has already reduced or suspended a number of monthly payments on entry into the accounts of expenditure for the 2013 financial year due to overshooting of ceilings or non-respect of payment deadlines. In taking the present decision, the Commission should take into account the amounts reduced or suspended in order to avoid all inappropriate or untimely payments, reimbursing amounts which could later be the object of financial correction. The amounts in question may be further examined, where appropriate, within the framework of the conformity clearance proceedings pursuant to Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005. To this effect, the present decision is without prejudice to the possible further conformity clearance decisions that the Commission may take pursuant to Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.

(10)

Article 10(1) second and third subparagraph of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 provide that the financial clearance decision should determine the amounts to be charged to the EU and to the Member State concerned pursuant to Articles 32 and 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005. In accordance with Article 119(1) second subparagraph of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, the procedure under Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 continues to apply to expenditure incurred and payments made for agricultural FY 2013. During agricultural FY 2013 Articles 32 and 33 were in force, therefore the amounts resulting from their application should be taken into account in the financial clearance decision in relation to FY 2013.

(11)

Pursuant to Article 32(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, 50 % of the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities should be borne by the Member State concerned if the recovery of the amounts concerned with such irregularities has not taken place within 4 years of the primary administrative or judicial finding, or within 8 years if the recovery is taken to the national courts. Article 32(3) of the said regulation obliges Member States to submit to the Commission, together with the annual accounts, a summary report on the recovery procedures undertaken in response to irregularities. Detailed rules on the application of the Member States' reporting obligation of the amounts to be recovered are laid down in Regulation (EC) No 885/2006. Annex III to the said regulation provides the table that had to be provided in 2014 by the Member States. On the basis of the tables completed by the Member States, the Commission should decide on the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities older than 4 or 8 years respectively. To this effect, the present decision is without prejudice to the possible further conformity clearance decisions that the Commission may take pursuant to Article 32(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.

(12)

Pursuant to Article 32(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 and by virtue of Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006, Member States may decide not to pursue recovery. Such a decision may only be taken if the costs already and likely to be incurred total more than the amount to be recovered or if the recovery proves impossible owing to the insolvency, recorded and recognised under national law, of the debtor or the persons legally responsible for the irregularity. If that decision has been taken within 4 years of the primary administrative or judicial finding or within 8 years if the recovery is taken to the national courts, 100 % of the financial consequences of the non-recovery should be borne by the EU budget. The amounts for which the Member State decided not to pursue recovery and the grounds for it are provided by the summary reports submitted by the concerned Member States in accordance to Article 32(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005. The Commission should not charge such amounts to the effect of the present decision to the concerned Member States and the respective financial consequences should be consequently borne by the EU budget. To this effect, the present decision is without prejudice to the possible further conformity clearance decisions that the Commission may take pursuant to Article 32(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.

(13)

In accordance with Article 30(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, the present decision is without prejudice to the possible further conformity clearance decisions that the Commission may take to exclude from European Union financing expenditure not effected in accordance with European Union rules,