Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN0186

    Case T-186/23: Action brought on 11 April 2023 — Insomnia v EUIPO — Black Insomnia Coffee (BLACK INSOMNIA COFFEE COMPANY)

    OJ C 189, 30.5.2023, p. 37–38 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.5.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 189/37

    Action brought on 11 April 2023 — Insomnia v EUIPO — Black Insomnia Coffee (BLACK INSOMNIA COFFEE COMPANY)

    (Case T-186/23)

    (2023/C 189/49)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Insomnia Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: L. Cassidy, A. Reynolds and P. Smyth, Solicitors)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Black Insomnia Coffee Co. Ltd (Winchester, United Kingdom)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark BLACK INSOMNIA COFFEE COMPANY — Application for registration No 18 128 261

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 February 2023 in Cases R 671/2022-1 and R 678/2022-1

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision in so far as it dismissed the appeal in Case R 678/2022-1 and refuse the mark in respect of all the contested goods in Class 25;

    —

    make an order to pay the applicant’s costs (under Articles 133 and 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court).

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top