Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN0182

    Case T-182/23: Action brought on 8 April 2023 — Innovation & Entrepreneurship Business School v EUIPO — Thinksales (Sales School Powered by IEBS)

    OJ C 189, 30.5.2023, p. 36–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.5.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 189/36

    Action brought on 8 April 2023 — Innovation & Entrepreneurship Business School v EUIPO — Thinksales (Sales School Powered by IEBS)

    (Case T-182/23)

    (2023/C 189/47)

    Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Innovation & Entrepreneurship Business School, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: L. Torrents Homs, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Thinksales, SL (Madrid, Spain)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

    Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark Sales School Powered by IEBS — Application for registration No 18 274 899

    Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 February 2023 in Case R 834/2022-1

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision in so far as it relates to the goods and services covered by the trade mark at issue in respect of which registration was refused;

    —

    grant full registration of the trade mark at issue;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings and order Thinksales to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

    Plea in law

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

    Top