I.

May substances which, although not set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 December 2004, have been identified as being used for the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances be the subject of the criminal offence of illegal trafficking across national borders for the purposes of Article 242(3) of the NK (as material), given that neither national law nor the applicable EU law requires a special import regime in respect of such substances? Article 242(3) of the NK is a blanket provision and refers to other special provisions that explicitly regulate the import of precursors. Is the national provision in Article 242(3) of the NK (whose content is analogous to that of the provision in the second sentence of Article 354a of the NK) compatible in that sense with Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights, given that there is no legal requirement for a registration regime in respect of the import of such materials that could flesh out the blanket provisions under criminal law?

II.

If this question is answered in the affirmative:

III.

May activities and conduct relating to the financing, negotiating and organising of the import of substances for the purposes of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 (APAAN and PMK), including via the engagement of other natural and/or legal persons who directly make the customs declaration and draw up the customs documents for the import, be regarded as ‘intermediary activities’, ‘operator’ or ‘importer’ within the meaning of Article 2(e), (f) and (h) of Regulation No 111/2005?