EUR-Lex Pristup zakonodavstvu Europske unije
Ovaj je dokument isječak s web-mjesta EUR-Lex
Dokument 62020TA0156
Case T-156/20: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — JA v Parliament (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Political group — Dismissal — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Right to be heard — Equal treatment — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Principle of sound administration — Liability)
Case T-156/20: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — JA v Parliament (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Political group — Dismissal — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Right to be heard — Equal treatment — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Principle of sound administration — Liability)
Case T-156/20: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — JA v Parliament (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Political group — Dismissal — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Right to be heard — Equal treatment — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Principle of sound administration — Liability)
OJ C 431, 25.10.2021., str. 31–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
25.10.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 431/31 |
Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — JA v Parliament
(Case T-156/20) (1)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Political group - Dismissal - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Right to be heard - Equal treatment - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Principle of sound administration - Liability)
(2021/C 431/35)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: JA (represented by: T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: I. Lázaro Betancor and N. Scafarto, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU for, first, annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 4 July 2019 to terminate the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff and, second, compensation for the non-material harm which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders JA to pay the costs. |