Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021TN0437

    Case T-437/21: Action brought on 20 July 2021 — Greenwich Polo Club v EUIPO — Lifestyle Equities (GREENWICH POLO CLUB)

    OJ C 401, 4.10.2021, p. 13–14 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    4.10.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 401/13

    Action brought on 20 July 2021 — Greenwich Polo Club v EUIPO — Lifestyle Equities (GREENWICH POLO CLUB)

    (Case T-437/21)

    (2021/C 401/15)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Greenwich Polo Club, Inc. (Greenwich, Connecticut, United States) (represented by: R. Zammitt, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lifestyle Equities CV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

    Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark GREENWICH POLO CLUB — Application for registration No 17 791 153

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 May 2021 in Case R 300/2020-1

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    order that the contested decision is annulled, and the contested mark proceeds to registration in respect of the contested goods (as well as the rest of the goods not appealed), alternatively, that the matter is remitted to the EUIPO for re-consideration;

    —

    order the payment of the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with the appeal.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top