Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CN0230

    Case C-230/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen (Belgium) lodged on 9 April 2021 — X, acting in her own name and as legal representative of her minor children, Y and Z v Belgische Staat

    OJ C 263, 5.7.2021, p. 7–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.7.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 263/7


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen (Belgium) lodged on 9 April 2021 — X, acting in her own name and as legal representative of her minor children, Y and Z v Belgische Staat

    (Case C-230/21)

    (2021/C 263/10)

    Language of the case: Dutch

    Referring court

    Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: X, acting in her own name and as legal representative of her minor children, Y and Z

    Defendant: Belgische Staat

    Questions referred

    1.

    Should EU law, in particular Article 2(f), read in conjunction with Article 10(3)(a), of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (1) be interpreted as meaning that a refugee who is an ‘unaccompanied minor’, and who resides in a Member State, must be ‘unmarried’ under her national law in order to enjoy the right to family reunification with relatives in the direct ascending line?

    2.

    If so, can a refugee minor whose marriage contracted abroad is not recognised for public policy reasons be regarded as an ‘unaccompanied minor’ within the meaning of Articles 2(f) and 10(3) of Directive 2003/86/EC?


    (1)  OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12.


    Top