This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TN0242
Case T-242/21: Action brought on 4 May 2021 — Pšonka v Council
Case T-242/21: Action brought on 4 May 2021 — Pšonka v Council
Case T-242/21: Action brought on 4 May 2021 — Pšonka v Council
OJ C 263, 5.7.2021, p. 26–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
5.7.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 263/26 |
Action brought on 4 May 2021 — Pšonka v Council
(Case T-242/21)
(2021/C 263/35)
Language of the case: Czech
Parties
Applicant: Artem Viktorovyč Pšonka (Kramatorsk, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Mleziva, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/394 of 4 March 2021 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, (1) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/391 of 4 March 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, (2) in so far as that decision and that regulation relate to the applicant; |
— |
Declare that the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and order it to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to sound administration
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of the applicant’s right to property
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging an infringement of the applicant’s fundamental rights as guaranteed by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
|