EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CA0601
Case C-601/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 March 2021 — Arrow Group ApS, Arrow Generics Ltd v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Pharmaceutical products — Market for antidepressant medicines (citalopram) — Settlement agreements concerning process patents concluded between a manufacturer of originator medicines holding those patents and manufacturers of generic medicines — Article 101 TFEU — Potential competition — Restriction by object — Characterisation — Calculation of the amount of the fine)
Case C-601/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 March 2021 — Arrow Group ApS, Arrow Generics Ltd v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Pharmaceutical products — Market for antidepressant medicines (citalopram) — Settlement agreements concerning process patents concluded between a manufacturer of originator medicines holding those patents and manufacturers of generic medicines — Article 101 TFEU — Potential competition — Restriction by object — Characterisation — Calculation of the amount of the fine)
Case C-601/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 March 2021 — Arrow Group ApS, Arrow Generics Ltd v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Pharmaceutical products — Market for antidepressant medicines (citalopram) — Settlement agreements concerning process patents concluded between a manufacturer of originator medicines holding those patents and manufacturers of generic medicines — Article 101 TFEU — Potential competition — Restriction by object — Characterisation — Calculation of the amount of the fine)
OJ C 206, 31.5.2021, p. 4–4
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
31.5.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 206/4 |
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 March 2021 — Arrow Group ApS, Arrow Generics Ltd v European Commission
(Case C-601/16 P) (1)
(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Pharmaceutical products - Market for antidepressant medicines (citalopram) - Settlement agreements concerning process patents concluded between a manufacturer of originator medicines holding those patents and manufacturers of generic medicines - Article 101 TFEU - Potential competition - Restriction by object - Characterisation - Calculation of the amount of the fine)
(2021/C 206/05)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellants: Arrow Group ApS, Arrow Generics Ltd (represented by: C. Firth, S. Kon and C. Humpe, Solicitors)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, T. Vecchi, B. Mongin and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents, and by B. Rayment and D. Bailey, Barristers, and by G. Peretz QC, and S. Kingston, Senior Counsel)
Intervener in support of the European Commission: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented: initially by D. Guðmundsdóttir, Z. Lavery, and D. Robertson, acting as Agents, and by J. Holmes QC, and subsequently by D. Guðmundsdóttir, acting as Agent, and by J. Holmes QC)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders Arrow Group ApS and Arrow Generics Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
|
3. |
Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs. |