Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62020TN0645

    Case T-645/20: Action brought on 23 October 2020 — NC and Others v Parliament and Council

    OJ C 9, 11.1.2021, p. 26–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.1.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 9/26

    Action brought on 23 October 2020 — NC and Others v Parliament and Council

    (Case T-645/20)

    (2021/C 9/38)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicants: NC, ND, NE, NF, Uniunea Naţională a Transportatorilor Rutieri din România (UNTRR) (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: R. Martens, lawyer)

    Defendants: European Parliament and Council of the European Union

    Form of order sought

    The applicants claim that the Court should:

    —

    annul, partially, Article 1 (3) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 amending Regulations (EC) No 1071/2009, (EC) No 1072/2009 and (EU) No 1024/2012 with a view to adapting them to developments in the road transport sector;

    —

    order the defendants to pay all costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicants rely on five pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging breach of Articles 2, 4(2) and 9 TEU, Articles 18 and 95 TFEU, Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principles of equality and non-discrimination as general principles of Union law juncto Article 5(4) TEU and the principle of proportionality as a general principle of Union law as to substantive and indirect discrimination.

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging breach of Articles 26, 49 and 56 TFEU, Articles 16 and 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union juncto Article 5(4) TEU and the principle of proportionality as a general principle of Union law as to unlawful restriction of the freedom to provide services, the freedom of establishment and the freedom to conduct a business.

    3.

    Third plea in law, alleging breach of Article 3(3) TEU, Articles 11 and 191 TFEU and Article 37 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as to contravening the preservation, protection and improvement of the quality of environment.

    4.

    Fourth plea in law, alleging breach of Article 296(2) TFEU, Article 5 Protocol 2 TFEU, the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making and the obligation to state reasons as to failure to provide for a detailed statement of reasons and failure to carry out impact assessments.

    5.

    Fifth plea in law, alleging breach of Articles 91 and 94 TFEU juncto Article 5(4) TEU and the principle of proportionality as a general principle of Union law as to seriously affecting the standard of living, the level of employment and the economic circumstances.
    Top