This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TB0294
Case T-294/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Vanhoudt and Others v EIB (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — EIB staff — Reform of the EIB remuneration and salary progression system — Remuneration simulation tool — Act not open to challenge — Purely confirmatory act — No new and substantial facts — Non-material harm — No causal link — Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-294/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Vanhoudt and Others v EIB (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — EIB staff — Reform of the EIB remuneration and salary progression system — Remuneration simulation tool — Act not open to challenge — Purely confirmatory act — No new and substantial facts — Non-material harm — No causal link — Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-294/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Vanhoudt and Others v EIB (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — EIB staff — Reform of the EIB remuneration and salary progression system — Remuneration simulation tool — Act not open to challenge — Purely confirmatory act — No new and substantial facts — Non-material harm — No causal link — Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 262, 10.8.2020, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.8.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 262/24 |
Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Vanhoudt and Others v EIB
(Case T-294/19) (1)
(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - EIB staff - Reform of the EIB remuneration and salary progression system - Remuneration simulation tool - Act not open to challenge - Purely confirmatory act - No new and substantial facts - Non-material harm - No causal link - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2020/C 262/32)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Patrick Vanhoudt (Gonderange, Luxembourg) and the other appellants whose names are listed in the annex (represented by: A. Haines, Barrister)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: T. Gilliams, J. Klein and J. Krueck, acting as Agents, and P.E. Partsch and T. Evans, lawyers)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the EIB of 31 January 2019 by which the EIB confirmed the decision of the Conciliation Board, which found that the conciliation procedure relating to the applicants’ requests to make available an official printout of the results of the remuneration simulation tool used to calculate the impact of the reforms and of the amicable settlement to compensate for the losses allegedly suffered as a result of the reforms had failed, and, second, compensation for the non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of that decision of 31 January 2019.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
|
2. |
Mr Patrick Vanhoudt and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall pay the costs. |