Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020CN0130

    Case C-130/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n.°3 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 9 March 2020 — YJ v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS)

    OJ C 201, 15.6.2020, p. 16–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    15.6.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 201/16


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n.o3 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 9 March 2020 — YJ v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS)

    (Case C-130/20)

    (2020/C 201/24)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Referring court

    Juzgado de lo Social n.o3 de Barcelona

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: YJ

    Defendant: Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS)

    Question referred

    Can a provision like Article 60(4) of the General Law on Social Security (Ley General de la Seguridad Social), which excludes the maternity supplement for women who retire [early] voluntarily, as opposed to those who retire, also voluntarily, at the normal age provided for, or who retire early but on the basis of work performed throughout their working lives, by reason [of] disability, or because they ceased employment before taking retirement through no fault of their own, be considered to constitute direct discrimination for the purposes of Directive 79/7? (1)


    (1)  Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security OJ 1979 L 6, p. 24.


    Top